Skip to content

STEP2 2015 -- Pure Mathematics

Exam: STEP2  |  Year: 2015  |  Questions: Q1—Q8  |  Total marks per question: 20

All questions are pure mathematics. Solutions and examiner commentary are included below.

QTopicDifficultyKey Techniques
1微积分与级数 (Calculus and Series)Standard求导判断单调性, 利用对数差分的裂项求和, 泰勒展开不等式
2三角学与几何 (Trigonometry and Geometry)Standard正弦定理, 和角/倍角公式, 三角形中的坐标与距离计算
3组合数学与数列 (Combinatorics and Sequences)Challenging三角不等式, 分类计数, 数学归纳法, 利用递推关系
4函数与图像 (Functions and Graphs)Standard反函数与复合函数图像变换, 驻点分析, 渐近线判断, 周期性平移
5三角恒等式与级数 (Trigonometric Identities and Series)Challenging数学归纳法, tan 加法公式, arctan 的值域讨论, 反三角函数级数
6积分 (Integration)Challenging三角恒等式证明,定积分换元法,利用对称性简化积分,分部积分思想
7解析几何 (Analytic Geometry)Challenging圆的方程,勾股定理,距离公式,不等式推导,y²≥0 条件
8向量几何 (Vector Geometry)Challenging向量线性组合,相似三角形比例,共线判定(向量平行),中点条件

Topic: 微积分与级数 (Calculus and Series)  |  Difficulty: Standard  |  Marks: 20

1 (i) By use of calculus, show that x−ln⁡(1+x)x - \ln(1 + x) is positive for all positive xx. Use this result to show that ∑k=1n1k>ln⁡(n+1).\sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac{1}{k} > \ln(n + 1) .

(ii) By considering x+ln⁡(1−x)x + \ln(1 - x), show that ∑k=1∞1k2<1+ln⁡2.\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k^2} < 1 + \ln 2 .

Hint

For the first result, show that the gradient of the function is positive for all positive values of xx (by differentiating) and also that f(0)≥0f(0) \ge 0. Once this result has been established sum a set of the terms, using x=1kx = \frac{1}{k}, note that ln⁡(1+1k)\ln(1 + \frac{1}{k}) can be written as ln⁡(k+1)−ln⁡(k)\ln(k + 1) - \ln(k) and then the required result follows.

For the second part, first show that x+ln⁡(1−x)x + \ln(1 - x) is negative for 0<x<10 < x < 1 and then use the substitution x=1k2x = \frac{1}{k^2}, noting that ln⁡(1−1k2)\ln(1 - \frac{1}{k^2}) can be written as ln⁡(k−1)−2ln⁡(k)+ln⁡(k+1)\ln(k - 1) - 2\ln(k) + \ln(k + 1). Deal with the sum starting with k=2k = 2 and then add the initial 1 afterwards.

Model Solution

Part (i)

Let f(x)=x−ln⁡(1+x)f(x) = x - \ln(1 + x).

Differentiating:

f′(x)=1−11+x=x1+xf'(x) = 1 - \frac{1}{1 + x} = \frac{x}{1 + x}

For x>0x > 0, both x>0x > 0 and 1+x>01 + x > 0, so f′(x)>0f'(x) > 0. Since ff is strictly increasing on (0,∞)(0, \infty) and

f(0)=0−ln⁡1=0,f(0) = 0 - \ln 1 = 0,

we conclude f(x)>0f(x) > 0 for all x>0x > 0. That is,

x>ln⁡(1+x)for all x>0.⋯(∗)x > \ln(1 + x) \qquad \text{for all } x > 0. \qquad \cdots (\ast)

Now set x=1kx = \dfrac{1}{k} for k=1,2,…,nk = 1, 2, \ldots, n. Since 1k>0\dfrac{1}{k} > 0, applying (∗)(\ast) gives

1k>ln⁡ ⁣(1+1k)=ln⁡ ⁣(k+1k)=ln⁡(k+1)−ln⁡k.\frac{1}{k} > \ln\!\left(1 + \frac{1}{k}\right) = \ln\!\left(\frac{k + 1}{k}\right) = \ln(k + 1) - \ln k.

Summing from k=1k = 1 to nn:

∑k=1n1k>∑k=1n[ln⁡(k+1)−ln⁡k].\sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac{1}{k} > \sum_{k=1}^{n} \bigl[\ln(k + 1) - \ln k\bigr].

The right-hand side is a telescoping sum:

∑k=1n[ln⁡(k+1)−ln⁡k]=(ln⁡2−ln⁡1)+(ln⁡3−ln⁡2)+⋯+[ln⁡(n+1)−ln⁡n]=ln⁡(n+1).\sum_{k=1}^{n} \bigl[\ln(k + 1) - \ln k\bigr] = (\ln 2 - \ln 1) + (\ln 3 - \ln 2) + \cdots + \bigl[\ln(n + 1) - \ln n\bigr] = \ln(n + 1).

Therefore

∑k=1n1k>ln⁡(n+1).(Q.E.D.)\sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac{1}{k} > \ln(n + 1). \qquad \text{(Q.E.D.)}

Part (ii)

Let g(x)=x+ln⁡(1−x)g(x) = x + \ln(1 - x).

Differentiating:

g′(x)=1−11−x=(1−x)−11−x=−x1−xg'(x) = 1 - \frac{1}{1 - x} = \frac{(1 - x) - 1}{1 - x} = \frac{-x}{1 - x}

For 0<x<10 < x < 1, we have −x<0-x < 0 and 1−x>01 - x > 0, so g′(x)<0g'(x) < 0. Since gg is strictly decreasing on (0,1)(0, 1) and

g(0)=0+ln⁡1=0,g(0) = 0 + \ln 1 = 0,

we conclude g(x)<0g(x) < 0 for all 0<x<10 < x < 1. That is,

x<−ln⁡(1−x)for all 0<x<1.⋯(∗∗)x < -\ln(1 - x) \qquad \text{for all } 0 < x < 1. \qquad \cdots (\ast\ast)

Now set x=1k2x = \dfrac{1}{k^2} for k⩾2k \geqslant 2. Since 0<1k2<10 < \dfrac{1}{k^2} < 1 for k⩾2k \geqslant 2, applying (∗∗)(\ast\ast) gives

1k2<−ln⁡ ⁣(1−1k2).\frac{1}{k^2} < -\ln\!\left(1 - \frac{1}{k^2}\right).

We compute the logarithm:

ln⁡ ⁣(1−1k2)=ln⁡ ⁣(k2−1k2)=ln⁡ ⁣((k−1)(k+1)k2)=ln⁡(k−1)+ln⁡(k+1)−2ln⁡k.\ln\!\left(1 - \frac{1}{k^2}\right) = \ln\!\left(\frac{k^2 - 1}{k^2}\right) = \ln\!\left(\frac{(k - 1)(k + 1)}{k^2}\right) = \ln(k - 1) + \ln(k + 1) - 2\ln k.

Summing from k=2k = 2 to nn:

∑k=2n1k2<−∑k=2n[ln⁡(k−1)+ln⁡(k+1)−2ln⁡k].\sum_{k=2}^{n} \frac{1}{k^2} < -\sum_{k=2}^{n} \bigl[\ln(k - 1) + \ln(k + 1) - 2\ln k\bigr].

The right-hand side telescopes. Writing out the terms:

∑k=2n[ln⁡(k−1)+ln⁡(k+1)−2ln⁡k]\sum_{k=2}^{n} \bigl[\ln(k - 1) + \ln(k + 1) - 2\ln k\bigr] =∑k=2nln⁡(k−1)+∑k=2nln⁡(k+1)−2∑k=2nln⁡k.= \sum_{k=2}^{n} \ln(k - 1) + \sum_{k=2}^{n} \ln(k + 1) - 2\sum_{k=2}^{n} \ln k.

  • First sum: ln⁡1+ln⁡2+⋯+ln⁡(n−1)\ln 1 + \ln 2 + \cdots + \ln(n - 1).
  • Second sum: ln⁡3+ln⁡4+⋯+ln⁡(n+1)\ln 3 + \ln 4 + \cdots + \ln(n + 1).
  • Third sum (with factor 2): 2ln⁡2+2ln⁡3+⋯+2ln⁡n2\ln 2 + 2\ln 3 + \cdots + 2\ln n.

Combining all terms:

  • ln⁡1=0\ln 1 = 0.
  • ln⁡2\ln 2 appears once (first sum) minus 2ln⁡22\ln 2 (third sum) =−ln⁡2= -\ln 2.
  • For 3⩽j⩽n−13 \leqslant j \leqslant n - 1: ln⁡j\ln j appears once in the first sum, once in the second sum, and −2-2 times in the third sum, giving coefficient 1+1−2=01 + 1 - 2 = 0.
  • ln⁡n\ln n appears once (second sum) minus 22 times (third sum) =−ln⁡n= -\ln n.
  • ln⁡(n+1)\ln(n + 1) appears once (second sum).

So the total is −ln⁡2−ln⁡n+ln⁡(n+1)=ln⁡ ⁣(n+12n)-\ln 2 - \ln n + \ln(n + 1) = \ln\!\left(\dfrac{n + 1}{2n}\right).

Therefore:

∑k=2n1k2<−ln⁡ ⁣(n+12n)=ln⁡ ⁣(2nn+1).\sum_{k=2}^{n} \frac{1}{k^2} < -\ln\!\left(\frac{n + 1}{2n}\right) = \ln\!\left(\frac{2n}{n + 1}\right).

Adding the k=1k = 1 term (112=1\frac{1}{1^2} = 1):

∑k=1n1k2<1+ln⁡ ⁣(2nn+1).\sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac{1}{k^2} < 1 + \ln\!\left(\frac{2n}{n + 1}\right).

As n→∞n \to \infty, 2nn+1→2\dfrac{2n}{n + 1} \to 2, so ln⁡ ⁣(2nn+1)→ln⁡2\ln\!\left(\dfrac{2n}{n + 1}\right) \to \ln 2. Since the partial sums are increasing and bounded above, the infinite series converges and

∑k=1∞1k2⩽1+ln⁡2.\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k^2} \leqslant 1 + \ln 2.

To obtain the strict inequality, note that each term 1k2\frac{1}{k^2} satisfies the strict inequality 1k2<−ln⁡ ⁣(1−1k2)\frac{1}{k^2} < -\ln\!\left(1 - \frac{1}{k^2}\right) for k⩾2k \geqslant 2, so the partial sums are strictly less than 1+ln⁡ ⁣(2nn+1)1 + \ln\!\left(\frac{2n}{n + 1}\right) for every finite nn. Since the partial sums are strictly less than a sequence converging to 1+ln⁡21 + \ln 2, we conclude

∑k=1∞1k2<1+ln⁡2.(Q.E.D.)\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k^2} < 1 + \ln 2. \qquad \text{(Q.E.D.)}

Examiner Notes

热门题但平均分偏低。常见错误:(1) 未同时验证梯度为正和 f(0)≥0;(2) 未按要求用第二部分结果而采用图解法;(3) 链式法则符号错误;(4) 求和公式写错。


Topic: 三角学与几何 (Trigonometry and Geometry)  |  Difficulty: Standard  |  Marks: 20

2 In the triangle ABCABC, angle BAC=αBAC = \alpha and angle CBA=2αCBA = 2\alpha, where 2α2\alpha is acute, and BC=xBC = x. Show that AB=(3−4sin⁡2α)xAB = (3 - 4 \sin^2 \alpha)x.

The point DD is the midpoint of ABAB and the point EE is the foot of the perpendicular from CC to ABAB. Find an expression for DEDE in terms of xx.

The point FF lies on the perpendicular bisector of ABAB and is a distance xx from CC. The points FF and BB lie on the same side of the line through AA and CC. Show that the line FCFC trisects the angle ACBACB.

Hint

As with all geometric questions a good diagram of the information given makes the solution to this question much easier to reach. The first result in this question follows from an application of the sine rule with applications of the relevant formulae for sin⁡(A+B)\sin(A + B) and the double angle formulae. From a diagram of the triangle it should then be an easy application of trigonometry to show that DE=x2DE = \frac{x}{2}. There are a number of different methods for establishing that FCFC trisects the angle ACBACB - one method is to show that sin⁡(∠FCE)=12\sin(\angle FCE) = \frac{1}{2}, following which it is relatively straightforward to work out the sizes of angles ACBACB and ACFACF in terms of α\alpha and show that they must satisfy the correct relationship.

Model Solution

Showing AB=(3−4sin⁡2α) xAB = (3 - 4\sin^2\alpha)\,x:

In triangle ABCABC, the angles are A=αA = \alpha, B=2αB = 2\alpha, so C=π−3αC = \pi - 3\alpha.

By the sine rule:

BCsin⁡A=ABsin⁡C  ⟹  xsin⁡α=ABsin⁡(π−3α)=ABsin⁡3α\frac{BC}{\sin A} = \frac{AB}{\sin C} \implies \frac{x}{\sin\alpha} = \frac{AB}{\sin(\pi - 3\alpha)} = \frac{AB}{\sin 3\alpha}

So AB=xsin⁡3αsin⁡αAB = \dfrac{x\sin 3\alpha}{\sin\alpha}.

Expanding sin⁡3α=sin⁡(2α+α)\sin 3\alpha = \sin(2\alpha + \alpha):

sin⁡3α=sin⁡2αcos⁡α+cos⁡2αsin⁡α=2sin⁡αcos⁡2α+(1−2sin⁡2α)sin⁡α\sin 3\alpha = \sin 2\alpha\cos\alpha + \cos 2\alpha\sin\alpha = 2\sin\alpha\cos^2\alpha + (1 - 2\sin^2\alpha)\sin\alpha =sin⁡α[2cos⁡2α+1−2sin⁡2α]=sin⁡α[2(1−sin⁡2α)+1−2sin⁡2α]=sin⁡α(3−4sin⁡2α).= \sin\alpha\bigl[2\cos^2\alpha + 1 - 2\sin^2\alpha\bigr] = \sin\alpha\bigl[2(1 - \sin^2\alpha) + 1 - 2\sin^2\alpha\bigr] = \sin\alpha(3 - 4\sin^2\alpha).

Therefore:

AB=x⋅sin⁡α(3−4sin⁡2α)sin⁡α=(3−4sin⁡2α) x.(Q.E.D.)AB = \frac{x \cdot \sin\alpha(3 - 4\sin^2\alpha)}{\sin\alpha} = (3 - 4\sin^2\alpha)\,x. \qquad \text{(Q.E.D.)}

Finding DEDE:

Set up coordinates with AA at the origin and ABAB along the xx-axis. Then:

  • A=(0, 0)A = (0,\, 0), B=((3−4sin⁡2α) x,  0)\quad B = \bigl((3 - 4\sin^2\alpha)\,x,\; 0\bigr).

Since angle BAC=αBAC = \alpha, the ray ACAC makes angle α\alpha with the xx-axis. By the sine rule, AC=xsin⁡2αsin⁡α=2xcos⁡αAC = \dfrac{x\sin 2\alpha}{\sin\alpha} = 2x\cos\alpha. So:

C=(2xcos⁡2α,  2xcos⁡αsin⁡α)=(2xcos⁡2α,  xsin⁡2α).C = (2x\cos^2\alpha,\; 2x\cos\alpha\sin\alpha) = (2x\cos^2\alpha,\; x\sin 2\alpha).

DD is the midpoint of ABAB: D=((3−4sin⁡2α) x2,  0)\quad D = \left(\dfrac{(3 - 4\sin^2\alpha)\,x}{2},\; 0\right).

EE is the foot of the perpendicular from CC to ABAB (the xx-axis): E=(2xcos⁡2α,  0)\quad E = (2x\cos^2\alpha,\; 0).

So:

DE=∣2xcos⁡2α−(3−4sin⁡2α) x2∣.DE = \left|2x\cos^2\alpha - \frac{(3 - 4\sin^2\alpha)\,x}{2}\right|.

Using cos⁡2α=1−sin⁡2α\cos^2\alpha = 1 - \sin^2\alpha:

2cos⁡2α=2−2sin⁡2α,3−4sin⁡2α=4cos⁡2α−1.2\cos^2\alpha = 2 - 2\sin^2\alpha, \qquad 3 - 4\sin^2\alpha = 4\cos^2\alpha - 1.

DE=∣x(2−2sin⁡2α)−x(4cos⁡2α−1)2∣=∣x(4−4sin⁡2α−4cos⁡2α+1)2∣DE = \left|x(2 - 2\sin^2\alpha) - \frac{x(4\cos^2\alpha - 1)}{2}\right| = \left|\frac{x(4 - 4\sin^2\alpha - 4\cos^2\alpha + 1)}{2}\right|

=∣x(5−4sin⁡2α−4cos⁡2α)2∣=∣x(5−4)2∣=x2.= \left|\frac{x(5 - 4\sin^2\alpha - 4\cos^2\alpha)}{2}\right| = \left|\frac{x(5 - 4)}{2}\right| = \frac{x}{2}.

Therefore DE=x2DE = \dfrac{x}{2}. (Q.E.D.)\qquad \text{(Q.E.D.)}

Showing FCFC trisects angle ACBACB:

The perpendicular bisector of ABAB is the vertical line x=(3−4sin⁡2α) x2x = \dfrac{(3 - 4\sin^2\alpha)\,x}{2}. So F=((3−4sin⁡2α) x2,  y)F = \left(\dfrac{(3 - 4\sin^2\alpha)\,x}{2},\; y\right) for some yy.

The condition FC=xFC = x gives:

((3−4sin⁡2α) x2−2xcos⁡2α)2+(y−xsin⁡2α)2=x2.\left(\frac{(3 - 4\sin^2\alpha)\,x}{2} - 2x\cos^2\alpha\right)^2 + (y - x\sin 2\alpha)^2 = x^2.

The horizontal difference simplifies: (4cos⁡2α−1) x2−2xcos⁡2α=−x2\dfrac{(4\cos^2\alpha - 1)\,x}{2} - 2x\cos^2\alpha = -\dfrac{x}{2}.

So x24+(y−xsin⁡2α)2=x2\dfrac{x^2}{4} + (y - x\sin 2\alpha)^2 = x^2, giving (y−xsin⁡2α)2=3x24(y - x\sin 2\alpha)^2 = \dfrac{3x^2}{4}, hence

y=xsin⁡2α±32 x.y = x\sin 2\alpha \pm \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\,x.

To determine the sign, we use the condition that FF and BB lie on the same side of line ACAC. Line ACAC passes through the origin in direction (cos⁡α, sin⁡α)(\cos\alpha,\, \sin\alpha), with equation sin⁡α⋅X−cos⁡α⋅Y=0\sin\alpha \cdot X - \cos\alpha \cdot Y = 0.

For B=((3−4sin⁡2α) x,  0)B = ((3 - 4\sin^2\alpha)\,x,\; 0): the value is sin⁡α⋅(3−4sin⁡2α) x>0\sin\alpha \cdot (3 - 4\sin^2\alpha)\,x > 0, so BB is on the positive side.

For FF: the value is sin⁡α⋅(3−4sin⁡2α) x2−cos⁡α⋅y\sin\alpha \cdot \dfrac{(3 - 4\sin^2\alpha)\,x}{2} - \cos\alpha \cdot y. Substituting and simplifying, this equals x2(3cos⁡α−sin⁡α)\dfrac{x}{2}(\sqrt{3}\cos\alpha - \sin\alpha) when y=xsin⁡2α−32 xy = x\sin 2\alpha - \dfrac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\,x (the "−-" sign), and −x2(sin⁡α+3cos⁡α)<0-\dfrac{x}{2}(\sin\alpha + \sqrt{3}\cos\alpha) < 0 when y=xsin⁡2α+32 xy = x\sin 2\alpha + \dfrac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\,x (the "++" sign).

Since 3cos⁡α>sin⁡α\sqrt{3}\cos\alpha > \sin\alpha for 0<α<π/40 < \alpha < \pi/4 (as tan⁡α<1<3\tan\alpha < 1 < \sqrt{3}), we take the "−-" sign:

F=((3−4sin⁡2α) x2,  xsin⁡2α−32 x).F = \left(\frac{(3 - 4\sin^2\alpha)\,x}{2},\; x\sin 2\alpha - \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\,x\right).

Now compute the vector CF→=F−C\overrightarrow{CF} = F - C:

CF→=(−x2,  −32 x),∣CF→∣=x14+34=x.✓\overrightarrow{CF} = \left(-\frac{x}{2},\; -\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\,x\right), \qquad |\overrightarrow{CF}| = x\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} + \frac{3}{4}} = x. \quad \checkmark

We compute ∠ACF\angle ACF using the dot product. The vector CA→=A−C=(−2xcos⁡2α,  −xsin⁡2α)\overrightarrow{CA} = A - C = (-2x\cos^2\alpha,\; -x\sin 2\alpha), with ∣CA→∣=2xcos⁡α|\overrightarrow{CA}| = 2x\cos\alpha.

CA→⋅CF→=(−2xcos⁡2α) ⁣(−x2)+(−xsin⁡2α) ⁣(−32 x)\overrightarrow{CA} \cdot \overrightarrow{CF} = (-2x\cos^2\alpha)\!\left(-\frac{x}{2}\right) + (-x\sin 2\alpha)\!\left(-\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\,x\right)

=x2cos⁡2α+32 x2sin⁡2α=x2cos⁡2α+3 x2sin⁡αcos⁡α=x2cos⁡α(cos⁡α+3sin⁡α).= x^2\cos^2\alpha + \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\,x^2\sin 2\alpha = x^2\cos^2\alpha + \sqrt{3}\,x^2\sin\alpha\cos\alpha = x^2\cos\alpha(\cos\alpha + \sqrt{3}\sin\alpha).

Therefore:

cos⁡(∠ACF)=x2cos⁡α(cos⁡α+3sin⁡α)2xcos⁡α⋅x=cos⁡α+3sin⁡α2.\cos(\angle ACF) = \frac{x^2\cos\alpha(\cos\alpha + \sqrt{3}\sin\alpha)}{2x\cos\alpha \cdot x} = \frac{\cos\alpha + \sqrt{3}\sin\alpha}{2}.

Using the identity cos⁡α+3sin⁡α=2sin⁡ ⁣(α+π6)=2cos⁡ ⁣(π3−α)\cos\alpha + \sqrt{3}\sin\alpha = 2\sin\!\left(\alpha + \dfrac{\pi}{6}\right) = 2\cos\!\left(\dfrac{\pi}{3} - \alpha\right):

cos⁡(∠ACF)=cos⁡ ⁣(π3−α).\cos(\angle ACF) = \cos\!\left(\frac{\pi}{3} - \alpha\right).

Since 0<α<π/40 < \alpha < \pi/4, we have π/3−α>0\pi/3 - \alpha > 0, and ∠ACF\angle ACF lies in (0,π)(0, \pi). So:

∠ACF=π3−α.\angle ACF = \frac{\pi}{3} - \alpha.

Since angle ACB=π−3αACB = \pi - 3\alpha:

∠FCB=∠ACB−∠ACF=(π−3α)−(π3−α)=2π3−2α=2 ⁣(π3−α)=2 ∠ACF.\angle FCB = \angle ACB - \angle ACF = (\pi - 3\alpha) - \left(\frac{\pi}{3} - \alpha\right) = \frac{2\pi}{3} - 2\alpha = 2\!\left(\frac{\pi}{3} - \alpha\right) = 2\,\angle ACF.

So ∠ACF:∠FCB=1:2\angle ACF : \angle FCB = 1 : 2, meaning FCFC divides angle ACBACB in the ratio 1:21 : 2. Since ∠ACB=3⋅∠ACF\angle ACB = 3 \cdot \angle ACF, the line FCFC trisects angle ACBACB. (Q.E.D.)\qquad \text{(Q.E.D.)}

Examiner Notes

平均分最高。解法多样但解释常不够清晰;建议画大图,注意图中角度标注不要颠倒。


Topic: 组合数学与数列 (Combinatorics and Sequences)  |  Difficulty: Challenging  |  Marks: 20

3 Three rods have lengths aa, bb and cc, where a<b<ca < b < c. The three rods can be made into a triangle (possibly of zero area) if a+b⩾ca + b \geqslant c.

Let TnT_n be the number of triangles that can be made with three rods chosen from nn rods of lengths 1,2,3,…,n1, 2, 3, \dots, n (where n⩾3n \geqslant 3). Show that T8−T7=2+4+6T_8 - T_7 = 2 + 4 + 6 and evaluate T8−T6T_8 - T_6. Write down expressions for T2m−T2m−1T_{2m} - T_{2m-1} and T2m−T2m−2T_{2m} - T_{2m-2}.

Prove by induction that T2m=16m(m−1)(4m+1)T_{2m} = \frac{1}{6} m(m - 1)(4m + 1), and find the corresponding result for an odd number of rods.

Hint

For the first part note that T8−T7T_8 - T_7 can be interpreted as the triangles that can be made using the rod of length 8 and two other, shorter rods. These can then be counted by noting that there are 6 possibilities if the length 7 rod is used, 4 possibilities if the length 6 (but not the length 7) rod is used and 2 possibilities if the length 5 (but not 6 or 7) rod is used. It is clear that at least one rod longer than length 4 must be used. To evaluate T8−T6T_8 - T_6 note that it is equal to (T8−T7)+(T7−T6)(T_8 - T_7) + (T_7 - T_6) and then evaluate T7−T6T_7 - T_6 in a similar manner to T8−T7T_8 - T_7. Similar reasoning easily gives formulae for T2m−T2m−1T_{2m} - T_{2m-1} and T2m−T2m−2T_{2m} - T_{2m-2}.

For the induction, the rule for T2m−T2m−2T_{2m} - T_{2m-2} deduced in the previous part can be used to show the inductive step, while the easiest way to show the base case is to list the possibilities. The easiest way to establish the result for an odd number of rods is to use the formula for T2m−T2m−1T_{2m} - T_{2m-1} and the formula for T2mT_{2m} that was just proven.

Model Solution

Counting triangles with longest side nn:

The difference Tn−Tn−1T_n - T_{n-1} counts the number of triangles using the rod of length nn (the longest) together with two shorter rods a<b<na < b < n satisfying a+b≥na + b \geq n. For a given bb (with b<nb < n), we need a≥n−ba \geq n - b and a<ba < b, so the number of valid choices for aa is (b−1)−(n−b)+1=2b−n(b - 1) - (n - b) + 1 = 2b - n, provided 2b−n≥12b - n \geq 1, i.e.\ b≥⌈n+12⌉b \geq \lceil \tfrac{n+1}{2} \rceil.

Showing T8−T7=2+4+6T_8 - T_7 = 2 + 4 + 6:

For n=8n = 8, the middle rod bb ranges from 55 to 77:

  • b=7b = 7: aa ranges from 8−7=18 - 7 = 1 to 66, giving 66 choices.
  • b=6b = 6: aa ranges from 8−6=28 - 6 = 2 to 55, giving 44 choices.
  • b=5b = 5: aa ranges from 8−5=38 - 5 = 3 to 44, giving 22 choices.

Hence T8−T7=6+4+2=2+4+6=12T_8 - T_7 = 6 + 4 + 2 = 2 + 4 + 6 = 12.

Evaluating T8−T6T_8 - T_6:

By the same reasoning with n=7n = 7, the middle rod bb ranges from 44 to 66:

  • b=6b = 6: aa ranges from 11 to 55, giving 55 choices.
  • b=5b = 5: aa ranges from 22 to 44, giving 33 choices.
  • b=4b = 4: a=3a = 3, giving 11 choice.

So T7−T6=5+3+1=9T_7 - T_6 = 5 + 3 + 1 = 9, and

T8−T6=(T8−T7)+(T7−T6)=12+9=21.T_8 - T_6 = (T_8 - T_7) + (T_7 - T_6) = 12 + 9 = 21.

General formula for Tn−Tn−1T_n - T_{n-1}:

For even n=2mn = 2m: bb ranges from m+1m + 1 to 2m−12m - 1, with 2b−2m2b - 2m choices each. Setting k=b−mk = b - m:

T2m−T2m−1=∑k=1m−12k=m(m−1).T_{2m} - T_{2m-1} = \sum_{k=1}^{m-1} 2k = m(m - 1).

For odd n=2m+1n = 2m + 1: bb ranges from m+1m + 1 to 2m2m, with 2b−(2m+1)2b - (2m+1) choices each. Setting k=b−mk = b - m:

T2m+1−T2m=∑k=1m(2k−1)=m2.T_{2m+1} - T_{2m} = \sum_{k=1}^{m} (2k - 1) = m^2.

Therefore, summarising the key differences:

T2m−T2m−1=m(m−1),T2m−1−T2m−2=(m−1)2.T_{2m} - T_{2m-1} = m(m-1), \qquad T_{2m-1} - T_{2m-2} = (m-1)^2.

Combining these two:

T2m−T2m−2=m(m−1)+(m−1)2=(m−1)[m+(m−1)]=(m−1)(2m−1).T_{2m} - T_{2m-2} = m(m-1) + (m-1)^2 = (m-1)[m + (m-1)] = (m-1)(2m - 1).

Induction proof that T2m=16m(m−1)(4m+1)T_{2m} = \frac{1}{6}m(m-1)(4m+1):

Base case (m=2m = 2): The possible triples from {1,2,3,4}\{1, 2, 3, 4\} are: (1,2,3)(1,2,3) with 1+2=3≥31+2=3 \geq 3; (1,3,4)(1,3,4) with 1+3=4≥41+3=4 \geq 4; (2,3,4)(2,3,4) with 2+3=5≥42+3=5 \geq 4. Triples (1,2,4)(1,2,4) fails (1+2<41+2 < 4). So T4=3=16(2)(1)(9)T_4 = 3 = \frac{1}{6}(2)(1)(9). The base case holds.

Inductive step: Assume T2(m−1)=16(m−1)(m−2)(4m−3)T_{2(m-1)} = \frac{1}{6}(m-1)(m-2)(4m-3) for some m≥3m \geq 3. Then:

T2m=T2(m−1)+(T2m−T2m−2)=16(m−1)(m−2)(4m−3)+(m−1)(2m−1).T_{2m} = T_{2(m-1)} + (T_{2m} - T_{2m-2}) = \frac{1}{6}(m-1)(m-2)(4m-3) + (m-1)(2m-1).

Factor out 16(m−1)\frac{1}{6}(m-1):

T2m=16(m−1)[(m−2)(4m−3)+6(2m−1)].T_{2m} = \frac{1}{6}(m-1)\left[(m-2)(4m-3) + 6(2m-1)\right].

Expanding the bracket:

(m−2)(4m−3)+6(2m−1)=4m2−11m+6+12m−6=4m2+m=m(4m+1).(m-2)(4m-3) + 6(2m-1) = 4m^2 - 11m + 6 + 12m - 6 = 4m^2 + m = m(4m+1).

Therefore T2m=16(m−1)⋅m(4m+1)=16m(m−1)(4m+1)T_{2m} = \frac{1}{6}(m-1) \cdot m(4m+1) = \frac{1}{6}m(m-1)(4m+1), completing the induction.

Odd number of rods:

Using T2m−1=T2m−m(m−1)T_{2m-1} = T_{2m} - m(m-1):

T2m−1=16m(m−1)(4m+1)−m(m−1)=m(m−1)[4m+16−1]=m(m−1)⋅4m−56.T_{2m-1} = \frac{1}{6}m(m-1)(4m+1) - m(m-1) = m(m-1)\left[\frac{4m+1}{6} - 1\right] = m(m-1) \cdot \frac{4m-5}{6}.

So:

T2m−1=16m(m−1)(4m−5).T_{2m-1} = \frac{1}{6}m(m-1)(4m - 5).

Verification: T3=16(2)(1)(3)=1T_3 = \frac{1}{6}(2)(1)(3) = 1; T5=16(3)(2)(7)=7T_5 = \frac{1}{6}(3)(2)(7) = 7; T7=16(4)(3)(11)=22T_7 = \frac{1}{6}(4)(3)(11) = 22. These agree with direct counting.

Examiner Notes

整体表现好,满分人数多。常见问题:(1) 未将 T8−T7T_8-T_7 理解为包含特定杆的三角形数而逐一枚举;(2) 归纳法基础情况未穷举验证;(3) 奇数情况部分未尝试或错误使用归纳法。


Topic: 函数与图像 (Functions and Graphs)  |  Difficulty: Standard  |  Marks: 20

4 (i) The continuous function ff is defined by

tan⁡f(x)=x(−∞<x<∞)\tan f(x) = x \quad (-\infty < x < \infty)

and f(0)=πf(0) = \pi. Sketch the curve y=f(x)y = f(x).

(ii) The continuous function gg is defined by

tan⁡g(x)=x1+x2(−∞<x<∞)\tan g(x) = \frac{x}{1 + x^2} \quad (-\infty < x < \infty)

and g(0)=πg(0) = \pi. Sketch the curves y=x1+x2y = \frac{x}{1 + x^2} and y=g(x)y = g(x).

(iii) The continuous function hh is defined by h(0)=πh(0) = \pi and

tan⁡h(x)=x1−x2(x≠±1).\tan h(x) = \frac{x}{1 - x^2} \quad (x \neq \pm 1).

(The values of h(x)h(x) at x=±1x = \pm 1 are such that h(x)h(x) is continuous at these points.) Sketch the curves y=x1−x2y = \frac{x}{1 - x^2} and y=h(x)y = h(x).

Hint

For the first part, note that the graph of arctan⁡x\arctan x satisfies the requirement of being continuous, but does not satisfy f(0)=πf(0) = \pi. Since tan⁡(x+π)=tan⁡x\tan(x + \pi) = \tan x, a translation of the graph of y=arctan⁡xy = \arctan x vertically by a distance of π\pi gives the required graph.

It should be clear that the graph of y=x1+x2y = \frac{x}{1+x^2} has no vertical asymptotes, approaches the xx-axis as x→±∞x \to \pm\infty and passes through the origin. Identifying the stationary points should be the next task after which a graph should be easy to sketch. The graph of y=g(x)y = g(x) should then be easy to sketch by considering the fact that f(x)f(x) is an increasing function and g(x)g(x) is obtained by composing the two functions already sketched.

To sketch the graph of y=x1−x2y = \frac{x}{1-x^2} first note that there must be two vertical asymptotes. Once stationary points have been checked for it should be straightforward to complete the sketch. In this case, the asymptotes need to be considered to deduce the shape of the graph for y=h(x)y = h(x) as the composition with f(x)f(x) will lead to discontinuities. Noting again that tan⁡(x+π)=tan⁡x\tan(x + \pi) = \tan x the discontinuities can be resolved by translating sections of that graph vertically by a distance of π\pi.

Model Solution

Part (i)

Since tan⁡(x+π)=tan⁡x\tan(x + \pi) = \tan x for all xx, and arctan⁡x\arctan x is the continuous inverse of tan⁡\tan on (−π2,π2)(-\frac{\pi}{2}, \frac{\pi}{2}), the function satisfying tan⁡f(x)=x\tan f(x) = x and f(0)=πf(0) = \pi is:

f(x)=arctan⁡x+π.f(x) = \arctan x + \pi.

Graph features:

  • Continuous and strictly increasing on (−∞,∞)(-\infty, \infty).
  • Passes through (0,π)(0, \pi).
  • Horizontal asymptotes: y=π2y = \frac{\pi}{2} as x→−∞x \to -\infty, and y=3π2y = \frac{3\pi}{2} as x→+∞x \to +\infty.
  • This is the standard graph of y=arctan⁡xy = \arctan x shifted upward by π\pi.

Part (ii)

First sketch y=x1+x2y = \frac{x}{1+x^2}.

Let u(x)=x1+x2u(x) = \frac{x}{1+x^2}. Key features:

  • u(0)=0u(0) = 0; uu is odd, so the graph is symmetric about the origin.
  • lim⁡x→±∞u(x)=0\lim_{x \to \pm\infty} u(x) = 0 (horizontal asymptote y=0y = 0).
  • No vertical asymptotes (denominator 1+x2>01 + x^2 > 0 for all xx).

To find stationary points, differentiate:

u′(x)=(1+x2)−x⋅2x(1+x2)2=1−x2(1+x2)2.u'(x) = \frac{(1+x^2) - x \cdot 2x}{(1+x^2)^2} = \frac{1 - x^2}{(1+x^2)^2}.

Setting u′(x)=0u'(x) = 0 gives x=±1x = \pm 1.

  • u(1)=12u(1) = \frac{1}{2} (maximum), u(−1)=−12u(-1) = -\frac{1}{2} (minimum).

The graph rises from 00 at x=−∞x = -\infty, reaches a minimum of −12-\frac{1}{2} at x=−1x = -1, passes through the origin, reaches a maximum of 12\frac{1}{2} at x=1x = 1, then returns to 00.

Now sketch y=g(x)y = g(x).

Since g(0)=πg(0) = \pi and tan⁡g(x)=u(x)\tan g(x) = u(x), we have g(x)=arctan⁡u(x)+πg(x) = \arctan u(x) + \pi. Because f(x)=arctan⁡x+πf(x) = \arctan x + \pi is strictly increasing, composing with uu preserves the qualitative shape:

  • g(0)=πg(0) = \pi, g(±1)=π±arctan⁡12g(\pm 1) = \pi \pm \arctan \tfrac{1}{2}.
  • As x→±∞x \to \pm\infty, u(x)→0u(x) \to 0, so g(x)→πg(x) \to \pi.
  • Since −12≤u(x)≤12-\frac{1}{2} \leq u(x) \leq \frac{1}{2}, the range of gg is [π−arctan⁡12,  π+arctan⁡12]≈[2.68,  3.46][\pi - \arctan \frac{1}{2},\; \pi + \arctan \frac{1}{2}] \approx [2.68,\; 3.46].
  • No vertical asymptotes; gg is continuous and bounded.

The graph of y=g(x)y = g(x) has the same “bump” shape as y=u(x)y = u(x), centred on y=πy = \pi instead of y=0y = 0, with a maximum of π+arctan⁡12\pi + \arctan \frac{1}{2} at x=1x = 1 and a minimum of π−arctan⁡12\pi - \arctan \frac{1}{2} at x=−1x = -1.

Part (iii)

First sketch y=x1−x2y = \frac{x}{1-x^2}.

Let v(x)=x1−x2v(x) = \frac{x}{1-x^2}. Key features:

  • v(0)=0v(0) = 0; vv is odd.
  • Vertical asymptotes at x=±1x = \pm 1 (denominator vanishes).
  • lim⁡x→±∞v(x)=0\lim_{x \to \pm\infty} v(x) = 0 (horizontal asymptote y=0y = 0).

Differentiate:

v′(x)=(1−x2)−x(−2x)(1−x2)2=1+x2(1−x2)2>0for all x≠±1.v'(x) = \frac{(1-x^2) - x(-2x)}{(1-x^2)^2} = \frac{1 + x^2}{(1-x^2)^2} > 0 \quad \text{for all } x \neq \pm 1.

So vv is strictly increasing on each of the three intervals (−∞,−1)(-\infty, -1), (−1,1)(-1, 1), (1,∞)(1, \infty). No stationary points.

On (−1,1)(-1, 1): vv increases from −∞-\infty to +∞+\infty (crossing the origin). On (−∞,−1)(-\infty, -1): vv increases from 0+0^+ to +∞+\infty. On (1,∞)(1, \infty): vv increases from −∞-\infty to 0−0^-.

Now sketch y=h(x)y = h(x).

Since v(x)v(x) takes all real values on (−1,1)(-1, 1), the composition h(x)=arctan⁡v(x)+kπh(x) = \arctan v(x) + k\pi (for suitable integer kk) has discontinuities at x=±1x = \pm 1 unless we choose different shifts on each interval. We require hh to be continuous everywhere.

On (−1,1)(-1, 1): vv ranges over (−∞,∞)(-\infty, \infty), so arctan⁡v(x)\arctan v(x) ranges over (−π2,π2)(-\frac{\pi}{2}, \frac{\pi}{2}). With h(0)=πh(0) = \pi, the correct branch is:

h(x)=arctan⁡v(x)+πon (−1,1).h(x) = \arctan v(x) + \pi \qquad \text{on } (-1, 1).

This gives h→π2h \to \frac{\pi}{2} as x→−1+x \to -1^+ and h→3π2h \to \frac{3\pi}{2} as x→1−x \to 1^-.

On (−∞,−1)(-\infty, -1): v(x)>0v(x) > 0, so arctan⁡v(x)∈(0,π2)\arctan v(x) \in (0, \frac{\pi}{2}). With the basic branch arctan⁡v(x)\arctan v(x), we get h→π2h \to \frac{\pi}{2} as x→−1−x \to -1^-, matching the left-limit from (−1,1)(-1, 1). So:

h(x)=arctan⁡v(x)on (−∞,−1).h(x) = \arctan v(x) \qquad \text{on } (-\infty, -1).

On (1,∞)(1, \infty): v(x)<0v(x) < 0, so arctan⁡v(x)∈(−π2,0)\arctan v(x) \in (-\frac{\pi}{2}, 0). We need h→3π2h \to \frac{3\pi}{2} as x→1+x \to 1^+, so we shift by 2π2\pi:

h(x)=arctan⁡v(x)+2πon (1,∞).h(x) = \arctan v(x) + 2\pi \qquad \text{on } (1, \infty).

Summary of hh:

h(x)={arctan⁡x1−x2,x<−1,arctan⁡x1−x2+π,−1<x<1,arctan⁡x1−x2+2π,x>1.h(x) = \begin{cases} \arctan\dfrac{x}{1-x^2}, & x < -1, \\[6pt] \arctan\dfrac{x}{1-x^2} + \pi, & -1 < x < 1, \\[6pt] \arctan\dfrac{x}{1-x^2} + 2\pi, & x > 1. \end{cases}

Continuity checks:

  • At x=−1x = -1: as x→−1−x \to -1^-, v(x)→+∞v(x) \to +\infty, so arctan⁡v(x)→π2\arctan v(x) \to \frac{\pi}{2}, giving h→π2h \to \frac{\pi}{2}. As x→−1+x \to -1^+, v(x)→−∞v(x) \to -\infty, so arctan⁡v(x)→−π2\arctan v(x) \to -\frac{\pi}{2}, giving h→−π2+π=π2h \to -\frac{\pi}{2} + \pi = \frac{\pi}{2}. Continuous. ✓
  • At x=1x = 1: as x→1−x \to 1^-, v(x)→+∞v(x) \to +\infty, so arctan⁡v(x)→π2\arctan v(x) \to \frac{\pi}{2}, giving h→π2+π=3π2h \to \frac{\pi}{2} + \pi = \frac{3\pi}{2}. As x→1+x \to 1^+, v(x)→−∞v(x) \to -\infty, so arctan⁡v(x)→−π2\arctan v(x) \to -\frac{\pi}{2}, giving h→−π2+2π=3π2h \to -\frac{\pi}{2} + 2\pi = \frac{3\pi}{2}. Continuous. ✓

Graph features of y=h(x)y = h(x):

  • Passes through (0,π)(0, \pi).
  • On (−∞,−1)(-\infty, -1): increases from 00 (as x→−∞x \to -\infty, since x1−x2→0+\frac{x}{1-x^2} \to 0^+) to π2\frac{\pi}{2} (at x=−1x = -1).
  • On (−1,1)(-1, 1): increases from π2\frac{\pi}{2} to 3π2\frac{3\pi}{2}, passing through (0,π)(0, \pi).
  • On (1,∞)(1, \infty): increases from 3π2\frac{3\pi}{2} (at x=1x = 1) to 2π2\pi (as x→+∞x \to +\infty, since x1−x2→0−\frac{x}{1-x^2} \to 0^-).
  • Horizontal asymptotes: y=0y = 0 as x→−∞x \to -\infty, and y=2πy = 2\pi as x→+∞x \to +\infty.
  • hh is strictly increasing and continuous on all of R\mathbb{R}, with the steepest gradient near x=±1x = \pm 1.
Examiner Notes

普遍表现较好。常见错误:(1) 画出不连续的图像(尽管声称连续);(2) 图像上标注点标错;(3) 用图像变换推理时出错;(4) 说要微分却做了积分。


Topic: 三角恒等式与级数 (Trigonometric Identities and Series)  |  Difficulty: Challenging  |  Marks: 20

5 In this question, the arctan function satisfies 0⩽arctan⁡x<12π0 \leqslant \arctan x < \frac{1}{2}\pi for x⩾0x \geqslant 0.

(i) Let

Sn=∑m=1narctan⁡(12m2),S_n = \sum_{m=1}^{n} \arctan \left( \frac{1}{2m^2} \right),

for n=1,2,3,…n = 1, 2, 3, \dots. Prove by induction that

tan⁡Sn=nn+1.\tan S_n = \frac{n}{n + 1}.

Prove also that

Sn=arctan⁡nn+1.S_n = \arctan \frac{n}{n + 1}.

(ii) In a triangle ABCABC, the lengths of the sides ABAB and BCBC are 4n24n^2 and 4n4−14n^4 - 1, respectively, and the angle at BB is a right angle. Let angle BCA=2αnBCA = 2\alpha_n. Show that

∑n=1∞αn=14π.\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \alpha_n = \frac{1}{4}\pi.

Hint

The initial proof by induction is a straightforward application of the tan⁡(A+B)\tan(A + B) formula. The final part of section (i) requires recognition that there are many possible values of xx to give a particular value of tan⁡x\tan x, but only one of them is the value that would be obtained by applying the arctan⁡\arctan function. The result can therefore be shown by establishing that the difference between consecutive terms of the sequence is never more than π\pi.

For the second part of the question a diagram of the triangle and application of the tan⁡2A\tan 2A formula shows that the value of αn\alpha_n must be of the form used in the first part of the question. All that remains is then to show that the limit of the sum must give the required value.

Model Solution

Part (i)

We prove tan⁡Sn=nn+1\tan S_n = \dfrac{n}{n+1} by induction.

Base case (n=1n = 1): S1=arctan⁡12S_1 = \arctan\dfrac{1}{2}, so tan⁡S1=12=11+1\tan S_1 = \dfrac{1}{2} = \dfrac{1}{1+1}. ✓

Inductive step: Assume tan⁡Sk=kk+1\tan S_k = \dfrac{k}{k+1} for some k⩾1k \geqslant 1. Then

Sk+1=Sk+arctan⁡12(k+1)2.S_{k+1} = S_k + \arctan\frac{1}{2(k+1)^2}.

Using the tangent addition formula:

tan⁡Sk+1=tan⁡Sk+12(k+1)21−tan⁡Sk⋅12(k+1)2=kk+1+12(k+1)21−k(k+1)⋅2(k+1)2.\tan S_{k+1} = \frac{\tan S_k + \dfrac{1}{2(k+1)^2}}{1 - \tan S_k \cdot \dfrac{1}{2(k+1)^2}} = \frac{\dfrac{k}{k+1} + \dfrac{1}{2(k+1)^2}}{1 - \dfrac{k}{(k+1) \cdot 2(k+1)^2}}.

For the numerator:

kk+1+12(k+1)2=2k(k+1)+12(k+1)2=2k2+2k+12(k+1)2.\frac{k}{k+1} + \frac{1}{2(k+1)^2} = \frac{2k(k+1) + 1}{2(k+1)^2} = \frac{2k^2 + 2k + 1}{2(k+1)^2}.

For the denominator:

1−k2(k+1)3=2(k+1)3−k2(k+1)3=2k3+6k2+6k+2−k2(k+1)3=2k3+6k2+5k+22(k+1)3.1 - \frac{k}{2(k+1)^3} = \frac{2(k+1)^3 - k}{2(k+1)^3} = \frac{2k^3 + 6k^2 + 6k + 2 - k}{2(k+1)^3} = \frac{2k^3 + 6k^2 + 5k + 2}{2(k+1)^3}.

Therefore:

tan⁡Sk+1=2k2+2k+12(k+1)2×2(k+1)32k3+6k2+5k+2=(2k2+2k+1)(k+1)2k3+6k2+5k+2.\tan S_{k+1} = \frac{2k^2 + 2k + 1}{2(k+1)^2} \times \frac{2(k+1)^3}{2k^3 + 6k^2 + 5k + 2} = \frac{(2k^2 + 2k + 1)(k+1)}{2k^3 + 6k^2 + 5k + 2}.

Factorising the denominator: 2k3+6k2+5k+2=(k+1)(2k2+4k+2)=2(k+1)32k^3 + 6k^2 + 5k + 2 = (k+1)(2k^2 + 4k + 2) = 2(k+1)^3.

tan⁡Sk+1=(2k2+2k+1)(k+1)2(k+1)3=2k2+2k+12(k+1)2.\tan S_{k+1} = \frac{(2k^2+2k+1)(k+1)}{2(k+1)^3} = \frac{2k^2+2k+1}{2(k+1)^2}.

Hmm, let me recheck. We need tan⁡Sk+1=k+1k+2\tan S_{k+1} = \frac{k+1}{k+2}.

Actually, let me recompute the denominator more carefully. We have:

1−k(k+1)⋅2(k+1)2=2(k+1)3−k2(k+1)3.1 - \frac{k}{(k+1) \cdot 2(k+1)^2} = \frac{2(k+1)^3 - k}{2(k+1)^3}.

Now 2(k+1)3=2(k3+3k2+3k+1)=2k3+6k2+6k+22(k+1)^3 = 2(k^3 + 3k^2 + 3k + 1) = 2k^3 + 6k^2 + 6k + 2, so the denominator is

2k3+6k2+5k+22(k+1)3.\frac{2k^3 + 6k^2 + 5k + 2}{2(k+1)^3}.

We can check that (k+2)(2k2+2k+1)=2k3+2k2+k+4k2+4k+2=2k3+6k2+5k+2(k+2)(2k^2 + 2k + 1) = 2k^3 + 2k^2 + k + 4k^2 + 4k + 2 = 2k^3 + 6k^2 + 5k + 2. ✓

Therefore:

tan⁡Sk+1=(2k2+2k+1)(k+1)(2k2+2k+1)(k+2)⋅11=k+1k+2.\tan S_{k+1} = \frac{(2k^2+2k+1)(k+1)}{(2k^2+2k+1)(k+2)} \cdot \frac{1}{1} = \frac{k+1}{k+2}.

This completes the induction. (Q.E.D.)\qquad \text{(Q.E.D.)}

Proof that Sn=arctan⁡nn+1S_n = \arctan\dfrac{n}{n+1}:

Since 12m2>0\dfrac{1}{2m^2} > 0 for each mm, and arctan⁡\arctan maps [0,∞)[0, \infty) to [0,π2)[0, \tfrac{\pi}{2}), each term arctan⁡12m2\arctan\dfrac{1}{2m^2} lies in (0,π2)(0, \tfrac{\pi}{2}). Therefore

0<Sn<∑m=1nπ2(not useful as stated).0 < S_n < \sum_{m=1}^{n} \frac{\pi}{2} \qquad \text{(not useful as stated)}.

More precisely, SnS_n is a sum of positive terms, so 0<Sn0 < S_n. Also, since arctan⁡x<x\arctan x < x for x>0x > 0 (from Q1(i) style reasoning), Sn<∑m=1n12m2<∑m=1∞12m2=π212<π2S_n < \sum_{m=1}^n \frac{1}{2m^2} < \sum_{m=1}^\infty \frac{1}{2m^2} = \frac{\pi^2}{12} < \frac{\pi}{2}. Hence Sn∈(0,π2)S_n \in (0, \frac{\pi}{2}).

In the interval [0,π2)[0, \frac{\pi}{2}), the tangent function is strictly increasing and therefore injective. We have shown tan⁡Sn=nn+1\tan S_n = \frac{n}{n+1}, and since arctan⁡nn+1\arctan\frac{n}{n+1} is the unique value in [0,π2)[0, \frac{\pi}{2}) with this tangent, we conclude

Sn=arctan⁡nn+1.(Q.E.D.)S_n = \arctan\frac{n}{n+1}. \qquad \text{(Q.E.D.)}

Part (ii)

In right-angled triangle ABCABC with the right angle at BB, we have AB=4n2AB = 4n^2, BC=4n4−1BC = 4n^4 - 1, and angle BCA=2αnBCA = 2\alpha_n.

tan⁡(2αn)=ABBC=4n24n4−1=4n2(2n2−1)(2n2+1).\tan(2\alpha_n) = \frac{AB}{BC} = \frac{4n^2}{4n^4 - 1} = \frac{4n^2}{(2n^2-1)(2n^2+1)}.

Let t=tan⁡αnt = \tan\alpha_n. The double angle formula gives tan⁡(2αn)=2t1−t2\tan(2\alpha_n) = \dfrac{2t}{1-t^2}, so:

2t1−t2=4n2(2n2−1)(2n2+1).\frac{2t}{1-t^2} = \frac{4n^2}{(2n^2-1)(2n^2+1)}.

This gives 2t(2n2−1)(2n2+1)=4n2(1−t2)2t(2n^2-1)(2n^2+1) = 4n^2(1-t^2), i.e.

2t(4n4−1)=4n2−4n2t2.2t(4n^4 - 1) = 4n^2 - 4n^2 t^2.

Rearranging: 4n2t2+2(4n4−1)t−4n2=04n^2 t^2 + 2(4n^4-1)t - 4n^2 = 0, i.e. 2n2t2+(4n4−1)t−2n2=02n^2 t^2 + (4n^4-1)t - 2n^2 = 0.

Using the quadratic formula or factoring: we try t=12n2t = \dfrac{1}{2n^2}:

2n2⋅14n4+(4n4−1)⋅12n2−2n2=12n2+4n4−12n2−2n2=4n42n2−2n2=2n2−2n2=0.✓2n^2 \cdot \frac{1}{4n^4} + (4n^4-1)\cdot\frac{1}{2n^2} - 2n^2 = \frac{1}{2n^2} + \frac{4n^4-1}{2n^2} - 2n^2 = \frac{4n^4}{2n^2} - 2n^2 = 2n^2 - 2n^2 = 0. \quad \checkmark

Since t>0t > 0 (as 0<2αn<π20 < 2\alpha_n < \frac{\pi}{2}), we take tan⁡αn=12n2\tan\alpha_n = \dfrac{1}{2n^2}.

Therefore αn=arctan⁡12n2\alpha_n = \arctan\dfrac{1}{2n^2}, and from part (i):

∑n=1Nαn=∑n=1Narctan⁡12n2=SN=arctan⁡NN+1.\sum_{n=1}^{N} \alpha_n = \sum_{n=1}^{N} \arctan\frac{1}{2n^2} = S_N = \arctan\frac{N}{N+1}.

Taking the limit:

∑n=1∞αn=lim⁡N→∞arctan⁡NN+1=arctan⁡1=π4.(Q.E.D.)\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \alpha_n = \lim_{N\to\infty} \arctan\frac{N}{N+1} = \arctan 1 = \frac{\pi}{4}. \qquad \text{(Q.E.D.)}

Examiner Notes

平均分偏低。多数人能完成归纳证明 tan⁡Sn=n/(n+1)\tan S_n = n/(n+1),但绝大多数未意识到还需进一步证明 Sn=arctan⁡(n/(n+1))S_n = \arctan(n/(n+1))(需讨论值域)。第二部分若识别出与第一部分的关联则表现较好。


Topic: 积分 (Integration)  |  Difficulty: Challenging  |  Marks: 20

6 (i) Show that sec⁡2(14π−12x)=21+sin⁡x.\sec^2 \left( \frac{1}{4}\pi - \frac{1}{2}x \right) = \frac{2}{1 + \sin x} . Hence integrate 11+sin⁡x\frac{1}{1 + \sin x} with respect to xx.

(ii) By means of the substitution y=π−xy = \pi - x, show that ∫0πxf(sin⁡x) dx=π2∫0πf(sin⁡x) dx,\int_{0}^{\pi} xf(\sin x) \, dx = \frac{\pi}{2} \int_{0}^{\pi} f(\sin x) \, dx , where ff is any function for which these integrals exist.

Hence evaluate ∫0πx1+sin⁡x dx.\int_{0}^{\pi} \frac{x}{1 + \sin x} \, dx .

(iii) Evaluate ∫0π2x3−3πx2(1+sin⁡x)2 dx.\int_{0}^{\pi} \frac{2x^3 - 3\pi x^2}{(1 + \sin x)^2} \, dx .

Hint

The first part of the question requires use of the cos⁡(A+B)\cos(A + B) formula. Following this the integral should be easy to evaluate given that ∫sec⁡2x dx=tan⁡x+c\int \sec^2 x \, dx = \tan x + c. In the second part, apply the substitution and note that the limits of the integral are reversed, which is equivalent to multiplying by -1. Following this a simple rearrangement (noting that the variable that the integration is taken over can be changed from yy to xx) should establish the required result. The integral at the end of this part can then be evaluated simply by applying this result along with the integral evaluated in part (i).

In the final part of the question it is tempting to make repeated applications of the result proven in part (ii). However, this is not valid as it would require the use of a function satisfying f(sin⁡x)=xf(\sin x) = x, which is not possible on the interval over which the integral is defined. Instead, application of a similar substitution to part (ii) to ∫0πx3f(sin⁡x) dx\int_0^\pi x^3 f(\sin x) \, dx will simplify to allow this integral to be evaluated based on the integration of 1(1+sin⁡x)2\frac{1}{(1+\sin x)^2}. An application of the result from part (ii) will also be required.

Model Solution

Part (i)

We show sec⁡2 ⁣(π4−x2)=21+sin⁡x\sec^2\!\left(\dfrac{\pi}{4} - \dfrac{x}{2}\right) = \dfrac{2}{1+\sin x}.

Using the cosine addition formula:

cos⁡ ⁣(π4−x2)=cos⁡π4cos⁡x2+sin⁡π4sin⁡x2=12 ⁣(cos⁡x2+sin⁡x2).\cos\!\left(\frac{\pi}{4} - \frac{x}{2}\right) = \cos\frac{\pi}{4}\cos\frac{x}{2} + \sin\frac{\pi}{4}\sin\frac{x}{2} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\!\left(\cos\frac{x}{2} + \sin\frac{x}{2}\right).

Squaring:

cos⁡2 ⁣(π4−x2)=12 ⁣(cos⁡x2+sin⁡x2)2=12 ⁣(cos⁡2x2+2sin⁡x2cos⁡x2+sin⁡2x2)=12(1+sin⁡x).\cos^2\!\left(\frac{\pi}{4} - \frac{x}{2}\right) = \frac{1}{2}\!\left(\cos\frac{x}{2} + \sin\frac{x}{2}\right)^2 = \frac{1}{2}\!\left(\cos^2\frac{x}{2} + 2\sin\frac{x}{2}\cos\frac{x}{2} + \sin^2\frac{x}{2}\right) = \frac{1}{2}(1 + \sin x).

Therefore

sec⁡2 ⁣(π4−x2)=1cos⁡2 ⁣(π4−x2)=21+sin⁡x.(Q.E.D.)\sec^2\!\left(\frac{\pi}{4} - \frac{x}{2}\right) = \frac{1}{\cos^2\!\left(\dfrac{\pi}{4} - \dfrac{x}{2}\right)} = \frac{2}{1 + \sin x}. \qquad \text{(Q.E.D.)}

To integrate 11+sin⁡x\dfrac{1}{1+\sin x}, note that

ddxtan⁡ ⁣(π4−x2)=−12sec⁡2 ⁣(π4−x2)=−11+sin⁡x.\frac{d}{dx}\tan\!\left(\frac{\pi}{4} - \frac{x}{2}\right) = -\frac{1}{2}\sec^2\!\left(\frac{\pi}{4} - \frac{x}{2}\right) = -\frac{1}{1+\sin x}.

Therefore

∫11+sin⁡x dx=−tan⁡ ⁣(π4−x2)+C.\int \frac{1}{1+\sin x}\,dx = -\tan\!\left(\frac{\pi}{4} - \frac{x}{2}\right) + C.

Part (ii)

Let I=∫0πx f(sin⁡x) dxI = \displaystyle\int_0^\pi x\,f(\sin x)\,dx. Substituting y=π−xy = \pi - x, so x=π−yx = \pi - y and dx=−dydx = -dy:

I=∫π0(π−y) f ⁣(sin⁡(π−y))(−dy)=∫0π(π−y) f(sin⁡y) dy,I = \int_{\pi}^{0}(\pi - y)\,f\!\big(\sin(\pi - y)\big)(-dy) = \int_0^\pi (\pi - y)\,f(\sin y)\,dy,

using sin⁡(π−y)=sin⁡y\sin(\pi - y) = \sin y. Expanding:

I=π∫0πf(sin⁡y) dy−∫0πy f(sin⁡y) dy=π∫0πf(sin⁡x) dx−I.I = \pi\int_0^\pi f(\sin y)\,dy - \int_0^\pi y\,f(\sin y)\,dy = \pi\int_0^\pi f(\sin x)\,dx - I.

Rearranging: 2I=π∫0πf(sin⁡x) dx2I = \pi\displaystyle\int_0^\pi f(\sin x)\,dx, giving

∫0πx f(sin⁡x) dx=π2∫0πf(sin⁡x) dx.(Q.E.D.)\int_0^\pi x\,f(\sin x)\,dx = \frac{\pi}{2}\int_0^\pi f(\sin x)\,dx. \qquad \text{(Q.E.D.)}

Evaluation. Apply this with f(sin⁡x)=11+sin⁡xf(\sin x) = \dfrac{1}{1+\sin x}:

∫0πx1+sin⁡x dx=π2∫0π11+sin⁡x dx.\int_0^\pi \frac{x}{1+\sin x}\,dx = \frac{\pi}{2}\int_0^\pi \frac{1}{1+\sin x}\,dx.

From part (i):

∫0π11+sin⁡x dx=[−tan⁡ ⁣(π4−x2)]0π=−tan⁡ ⁣(−π4)+tan⁡π4=1+1=2.\int_0^\pi \frac{1}{1+\sin x}\,dx = \left[-\tan\!\left(\frac{\pi}{4} - \frac{x}{2}\right)\right]_0^\pi = -\tan\!\left(-\frac{\pi}{4}\right) + \tan\frac{\pi}{4} = 1 + 1 = 2.

Therefore

∫0πx1+sin⁡x dx=π2⋅2=π.\int_0^\pi \frac{x}{1+\sin x}\,dx = \frac{\pi}{2}\cdot 2 = \pi.

Part (iii)

Let I0=∫0πdx(1+sin⁡x)2I_0 = \displaystyle\int_0^\pi \frac{dx}{(1+\sin x)^2} and Ik=∫0πxk(1+sin⁡x)2 dxI_k = \displaystyle\int_0^\pi \frac{x^k}{(1+\sin x)^2}\,dx for k=1,2,3k = 1, 2, 3. We need 2I3−3πI22I_3 - 3\pi I_2.

Step 1: Derive relations via the substitution y=π−xy = \pi - x.

For I3I_3, substitute y=π−xy = \pi - x:

I3=∫0π(π−x)3(1+sin⁡x)2 dx=∫0ππ3−3π2x+3πx2−x3(1+sin⁡x)2 dx=π3I0−3π2I1+3πI2−I3.I_3 = \int_0^\pi \frac{(\pi - x)^3}{(1+\sin x)^2}\,dx = \int_0^\pi \frac{\pi^3 - 3\pi^2 x + 3\pi x^2 - x^3}{(1+\sin x)^2}\,dx = \pi^3 I_0 - 3\pi^2 I_1 + 3\pi I_2 - I_3.

So 2I3=π3I0−3π2I1+3πI22I_3 = \pi^3 I_0 - 3\pi^2 I_1 + 3\pi I_2. ⋯(∗)\qquad \cdots (*)

For I2I_2, the same substitution gives:

I2=∫0π(π−x)2(1+sin⁡x)2 dx=π2I0−2πI1+I2.I_2 = \int_0^\pi \frac{(\pi - x)^2}{(1+\sin x)^2}\,dx = \pi^2 I_0 - 2\pi I_1 + I_2.

So 0=π2I0−2πI10 = \pi^2 I_0 - 2\pi I_1, giving I1=π2 I0I_1 = \dfrac{\pi}{2}\,I_0. ⋯(∗∗)\qquad \cdots (**)

This is also the result from part (ii) applied to f(sin⁡x)=1(1+sin⁡x)2f(\sin x) = \dfrac{1}{(1+\sin x)^2}.

Step 2: Compute 2I3−3πI22I_3 - 3\pi I_2.

From (∗)(*):

2I3−3πI2=π3I0−3π2I1+3πI2−3πI2=π3I0−3π2I1.2I_3 - 3\pi I_2 = \pi^3 I_0 - 3\pi^2 I_1 + 3\pi I_2 - 3\pi I_2 = \pi^3 I_0 - 3\pi^2 I_1.

Substituting (∗∗)(**):

2I3−3πI2=π3I0−3π2⋅π2 I0=π3I0−3π32 I0=−π32 I0.2I_3 - 3\pi I_2 = \pi^3 I_0 - 3\pi^2 \cdot \frac{\pi}{2}\,I_0 = \pi^3 I_0 - \frac{3\pi^3}{2}\,I_0 = -\frac{\pi^3}{2}\,I_0.

Step 3: Evaluate I0=∫0πdx(1+sin⁡x)2I_0 = \displaystyle\int_0^\pi \frac{dx}{(1+\sin x)^2}.

Use t=tan⁡x2t = \tan\dfrac{x}{2}, so sin⁡x=2t1+t2\sin x = \dfrac{2t}{1+t^2}, dx=2 dt1+t2dx = \dfrac{2\,dt}{1+t^2}, with limits x=0→t=0x = 0 \to t = 0, x=π→t=1x = \pi \to t = 1.

1+sin⁡x=(1+t)21+t2,(1+sin⁡x)2=(1+t)4(1+t2)2.1 + \sin x = \frac{(1+t)^2}{1+t^2}, \qquad (1+\sin x)^2 = \frac{(1+t)^4}{(1+t^2)^2}.

I0=∫01(1+t2)2(1+t)4⋅2 dt1+t2=2∫011+t2(1+t)4 dt.I_0 = \int_0^1 \frac{(1+t^2)^2}{(1+t)^4}\cdot\frac{2\,dt}{1+t^2} = 2\int_0^1 \frac{1+t^2}{(1+t)^4}\,dt.

Write 1+t2=(1+t)2−2(1+t)+21+t^2 = (1+t)^2 - 2(1+t) + 2:

1+t2(1+t)4=1(1+t)2−2(1+t)3+2(1+t)4.\frac{1+t^2}{(1+t)^4} = \frac{1}{(1+t)^2} - \frac{2}{(1+t)^3} + \frac{2}{(1+t)^4}.

Integrating:

∫01dt(1+t)2=[−11+t]01=−12+1=12,\int_0^1 \frac{dt}{(1+t)^2} = \left[-\frac{1}{1+t}\right]_0^1 = -\frac{1}{2} + 1 = \frac{1}{2},

∫01dt(1+t)3=[−12(1+t)2]01=−18+12=38,\int_0^1 \frac{dt}{(1+t)^3} = \left[-\frac{1}{2(1+t)^2}\right]_0^1 = -\frac{1}{8} + \frac{1}{2} = \frac{3}{8},

∫01dt(1+t)4=[−13(1+t)3]01=−124+13=724.\int_0^1 \frac{dt}{(1+t)^4} = \left[-\frac{1}{3(1+t)^3}\right]_0^1 = -\frac{1}{24} + \frac{1}{3} = \frac{7}{24}.

Therefore

I0=2(12−68+1424)=2(12−18+1424)=2⋅824=23.I_0 = 2\left(\frac{1}{2} - \frac{6}{8} + \frac{14}{24}\right) = 2\left(\frac{12 - 18 + 14}{24}\right) = 2\cdot\frac{8}{24} = \frac{2}{3}.

Step 4: Final answer.

∫0π2x3−3πx2(1+sin⁡x)2 dx=2I3−3πI2=−π32⋅23=−π33.\int_0^\pi \frac{2x^3 - 3\pi x^2}{(1+\sin x)^2}\,dx = 2I_3 - 3\pi I_2 = -\frac{\pi^3}{2}\cdot\frac{2}{3} = -\frac{\pi^3}{3}.

Examiner Notes

This was the most popular question on the paper with over 1000 attempts made. The first section did not present significant difficulties to candidates and the integration was generally well completed, although occasionally with an error in the factor. The second part proved difficult for a number of candidates who failed to change the variable in the integral correctly, or in some cases did not change the variable in every position that it occurred. Other candidates did not apply a correct result for dealing with the trigonometric functions involved or did not clearly show how the required result was reached as the solution jumped through several steps to a statement of the result asked for in the question. There were very few successful attempts at the final part of the question, but they did include a variety of methods for evaluating the integral once the substitution had been made.


Topic: 解析几何 (Analytic Geometry)  |  Difficulty: Challenging  |  Marks: 20

7 A circle CC is said to be bisected by a curve XX if XX meets CC in exactly two points and these points are diametrically opposite each other on CC.

(i) Let CC be the circle of radius aa in the xx-yy plane with centre at the origin. Show, by giving its equation, that it is possible to find a circle of given radius rr that bisects CC provided r>ar > a. Show that no circle of radius rr bisects CC if r⩽ar \leqslant a.

(ii) Let C1C_1 and C2C_2 be circles with centres at (−d,0)(-d, 0) and (d,0)(d, 0) and radii a1a_1 and a2a_2, respectively, where d>a1d > a_1 and d>a2d > a_2. Let DD be a circle of radius rr that bisects both C1C_1 and C2C_2. Show that the xx-coordinate of the centre of DD is a22−a124d\frac{a_2^2 - a_1^2}{4d}.

Obtain an expression in terms of dd, rr, a1a_1 and a2a_2 for the yy-coordinate of the centre of DD, and deduce that rr must satisfy 16r2d2⩾(4d2+(a2−a1)2)(4d2+(a2+a1)2).16r^2d^2 \geqslant \left( 4d^2 + (a_2 - a_1)^2 \right) \left( 4d^2 + (a_2 + a_1)^2 \right) .

Hint

For part (i) note that the lines joining the centres of the two circles and one of the points where the bisection occurs form a right-angled triangle, so the radius of the new circle can be calculated. To show that no such circle can exist when r<ar < a note that the diametrically opposite points on CC must be a distance of 2a2a apart, and no two points on a circle of radius rr can be that far apart. For the case r=ar = a note that the new circle would be the same as CC (and so would have more than two intersection points).

For part (ii) a similar method can be used to deduce the distances between the centre of the new circle and each of C1C_1 and C2C_2. From these distances equations can be formed relating the xx and yy coordinates of the centre of the new circle. It is then an easy task to eliminate the yy-coordinate of the centre of the circle from the equations to get the given value of the xx-coordinate.

The expression for yy can easily be found by substituting back into the equations obtained from the distance between the centres of two of the circles. Once this is done, note that y2≥0y^2 \geq 0 to obtain the final inequality.

Model Solution

Part (i)

Let CC be the circle of radius aa centred at the origin OO, and let DD be a circle of radius rr centred at point PP that bisects CC. The two intersection points are diametrically opposite on CC, so they lie on a diameter of CC. Call them AA and BB, where OA⃗=au^\vec{OA} = a\hat{\mathbf{u}} and OB⃗=−au^\vec{OB} = -a\hat{\mathbf{u}} for some unit vector u^\hat{\mathbf{u}}.

Since AA and BB both lie on DD, the centre PP is equidistant from AA and BB. Therefore PP lies on the perpendicular bisector of ABAB, which passes through OO and is perpendicular to u^\hat{\mathbf{u}}. Hence OP⃗⋅u^=0\vec{OP} \cdot \hat{\mathbf{u}} = 0.

Since AA lies on DD, we have ∣PA∣=r|PA| = r:

∣OP⃗−au^∣2=r2|\vec{OP} - a\hat{\mathbf{u}}|^2 = r^2 ∣OP⃗∣2−2a(OP⃗⋅u^)+a2=r2|\vec{OP}|^2 - 2a(\vec{OP} \cdot \hat{\mathbf{u}}) + a^2 = r^2 ∣OP⃗∣2+a2=r2(since OP⃗⋅u^=0)|\vec{OP}|^2 + a^2 = r^2 \qquad \text{(since } \vec{OP} \cdot \hat{\mathbf{u}} = 0\text{)}

So ∣OP⃗∣=r2−a2|\vec{OP}| = \sqrt{r^2 - a^2}, which requires r≥ar \geq a.

If r>ar > a: Choose PP at distance r2−a2\sqrt{r^2 - a^2} from OO in any direction perpendicular to u^\hat{\mathbf{u}}. For instance, with u^=j^\hat{\mathbf{u}} = \hat{\mathbf{j}}, take P=(r2−a2, 0)P = (\sqrt{r^2 - a^2},\, 0). Then DD has equation

(x−r2−a2)2+y2=r2.(x - \sqrt{r^2 - a^2})^2 + y^2 = r^2.

The intersection with CC: substituting the condition x⋅u^=0\mathbf{x} \cdot \hat{\mathbf{u}} = 0 (i.e. y=0y = 0 for this choice) into x2+y2=a2x^2 + y^2 = a^2 gives exactly the two points (0,a)(0, a) and (0,−a)(0, -a), which are diametrically opposite on CC. So DD bisects CC.

If r=ar = a: Then ∣OP⃗∣=0|\vec{OP}| = 0, so P=OP = O and DD coincides with CC. The circles meet at every point (not exactly two), so DD does not bisect CC.

If r<ar < a: Then r2−a2<0r^2 - a^2 < 0, so no real position for PP exists. No circle of radius rr can bisect CC.

Therefore a circle of radius rr bisects CC if and only if r>ar > a. (Q.E.D.)\qquad \text{(Q.E.D.)}

Part (ii)

Let DD have centre P=(x,y)P = (x, y) and radius rr. Since DD bisects C1C_1 (centre (−d,0)(-d, 0), radius a1a_1), by the same argument as part (i):

(x+d)2+y2=r2−a12⋯(1)(x + d)^2 + y^2 = r^2 - a_1^2 \qquad \cdots (1)

Since DD bisects C2C_2 (centre (d,0)(d, 0), radius a2a_2):

(x−d)2+y2=r2−a22⋯(2)(x - d)^2 + y^2 = r^2 - a_2^2 \qquad \cdots (2)

Subtracting (2) from (1):

(x+d)2−(x−d)2=(r2−a12)−(r2−a22)(x + d)^2 - (x - d)^2 = (r^2 - a_1^2) - (r^2 - a_2^2)

Expanding the left side: (x2+2dx+d2)−(x2−2dx+d2)=4dx(x^2 + 2dx + d^2) - (x^2 - 2dx + d^2) = 4dx.

4dx=a22−a124dx = a_2^2 - a_1^2

x=a22−a124d(Q.E.D.)x = \frac{a_2^2 - a_1^2}{4d} \qquad \text{(Q.E.D.)}

To find yy, substitute into equation (1):

y2=r2−a12−(x+d)2y^2 = r^2 - a_1^2 - (x + d)^2

x+d=a22−a124d+d=a22−a12+4d24dx + d = \frac{a_2^2 - a_1^2}{4d} + d = \frac{a_2^2 - a_1^2 + 4d^2}{4d}

y2=r2−a12−(4d2+a22−a12)216d2⋯(∗)y^2 = r^2 - a_1^2 - \frac{(4d^2 + a_2^2 - a_1^2)^2}{16d^2} \qquad \cdots (*)

Since y2≥0y^2 \geq 0, we require r2−a12≥(4d2+a22−a12)216d2r^2 - a_1^2 \geq \dfrac{(4d^2 + a_2^2 - a_1^2)^2}{16d^2}, i.e.

16d2(r2−a12)≥(4d2+a22−a12)2.16d^2(r^2 - a_1^2) \geq (4d^2 + a_2^2 - a_1^2)^2.

We show that 16d2(r2−a12)−(4d2+a22−a12)216d^2(r^2 - a_1^2) - (4d^2 + a_2^2 - a_1^2)^2 equals the right side of the desired inequality minus the left side. Expanding:

16d2r2−16d2a12−(4d2+a22−a12)2≥016d^2 r^2 - 16d^2 a_1^2 - (4d^2 + a_2^2 - a_1^2)^2 \geq 0

16d2r2≥16d2a12+(4d2+a22−a12)216d^2 r^2 \geq 16d^2 a_1^2 + (4d^2 + a_2^2 - a_1^2)^2

We claim that 16d2a12+(4d2+a22−a12)2=(4d2+(a2−a1)2)(4d2+(a2+a1)2)16d^2 a_1^2 + (4d^2 + a_2^2 - a_1^2)^2 = (4d^2 + (a_2 - a_1)^2)(4d^2 + (a_2 + a_1)^2).

Expanding the right side with S=a1+a2S = a_1 + a_2 and D=a2−a1D = a_2 - a_1 (noting SD=a22−a12SD = a_2^2 - a_1^2 and S2+D2=2(a12+a22)S^2 + D^2 = 2(a_1^2 + a_2^2)):

(4d2+D2)(4d2+S2)=16d4+4d2(S2+D2)+S2D2(4d^2 + D^2)(4d^2 + S^2) = 16d^4 + 4d^2(S^2 + D^2) + S^2 D^2 =16d4+8d2(a12+a22)+(a22−a12)2= 16d^4 + 8d^2(a_1^2 + a_2^2) + (a_2^2 - a_1^2)^2

And the left side:

16d2a12+(4d2+a22−a12)2=16d2a12+16d4+8d2(a22−a12)+(a22−a12)216d^2 a_1^2 + (4d^2 + a_2^2 - a_1^2)^2 = 16d^2 a_1^2 + 16d^4 + 8d^2(a_2^2 - a_1^2) + (a_2^2 - a_1^2)^2 =16d4+8d2a22+(a22−a12)2=16d4+8d2(a12+a22)+(a22−a12)2✓= 16d^4 + 8d^2 a_2^2 + (a_2^2 - a_1^2)^2 = 16d^4 + 8d^2(a_1^2 + a_2^2) + (a_2^2 - a_1^2)^2 \checkmark

These are identical, so the condition y2≥0y^2 \geq 0 becomes:

16r2d2≥(4d2+(a2−a1)2)(4d2+(a2+a1)2).(Q.E.D.)16r^2 d^2 \geq (4d^2 + (a_2 - a_1)^2)(4d^2 + (a_2 + a_1)^2). \qquad \text{(Q.E.D.)}

Examiner Notes

The first part of this question was generally well answered, although a significant number of answers did not give the equation of the new circle. The case in part (i) where the two circles have the same radius was often not considered and the explanations for there not being such a circle in some cases were often not sufficiently clear. A significant number of candidates made the incorrect assumption in the second part that the centres of the three circles must lie on a straight line or attempted this part of the question with incorrect methods, such as equating the equations of the two given circles. In the final part of the question not all candidates realised that y² must be positive and were unable to obtain the required inequality by any other means.


Topic: 向量几何 (Vector Geometry)  |  Difficulty: Challenging  |  Marks: 20

The diagram above shows two non-overlapping circles C1C_1 and C2C_2 of different sizes. The lines LL and L′L' are the two common tangents to C1C_1 and C2C_2 such that the two circles lie on the same side of each of the tangents. The lines LL and L′L' intersect at the point PP which is called the focus of C1C_1 and C2C_2.

(i) Let x1\mathbf{x}_1 and x2\mathbf{x}_2 be the position vectors of the centres of C1C_1 and C2C_2, respectively. Show that the position vector of PP is

r1x2−r2x1r1−r2,\frac{r_1\mathbf{x}_2 - r_2\mathbf{x}_1}{r_1 - r_2},

where r1r_1 and r2r_2 are the radii of C1C_1 and C2C_2, respectively.

(ii) The circle C3C_3 does not overlap either C1C_1 or C2C_2 and its radius, r3r_3, satisfies r1≠r3≠r2r_1 \neq r_3 \neq r_2. The focus of C1C_1 and C3C_3 is QQ, and the focus of C2C_2 and C3C_3 is RR. Show that PP, QQ and RR lie on the same straight line.

(iii) Find a condition on r1r_1, r2r_2 and r3r_3 for QQ to lie half-way between PP and RR.

Hint

The first part of the question follows from consideration of similar triangles in the diagram if the line through PP and the centres of the circles is added. For the second part, expressions can be written down for the position vectors of QQ and RR by noting that the same method as in part (i) will still apply. The vectors PQ⃗\vec{PQ} and QR⃗\vec{QR} can then be compared to show that one is a multiple of the other.

For the final part of the question, note that QQ will lie halfway between PP and RR if PQ⃗=QR⃗\vec{PQ} = \vec{QR}.

Model Solution

Part (i)

Let O1O_1 and O2O_2 be the centres of C1C_1 and C2C_2 with position vectors x1\mathbf{x}_1 and x2\mathbf{x}_2, and radii r1r_1 and r2r_2 respectively (with r1≠r2r_1 \neq r_2).

Consider the line through O1O_1, O2O_2 and PP. Drop perpendiculars from O1O_1 and O2O_2 to one of the common tangents LL, meeting LL at T1T_1 and T2T_2 respectively. Then O1T1=r1O_1T_1 = r_1 and O2T2=r2O_2T_2 = r_2, with O1T1⊥LO_1T_1 \perp L and O2T2⊥LO_2T_2 \perp L.

Since O1T1∥O2T2O_1T_1 \parallel O_2T_2 (both perpendicular to LL), the triangles △PO1T1\triangle PO_1T_1 and △PO2T2\triangle PO_2T_2 are similar:

PO1PO2=O1T1O2T2=r1r2\frac{PO_1}{PO_2} = \frac{O_1T_1}{O_2T_2} = \frac{r_1}{r_2}

Let PP have position vector p\mathbf{p}. Since PP lies on the line through O1O_1 and O2O_2 (on the side of the larger circle, beyond the larger centre), we can write:

p=x1+t(x2−x1)for some scalar t.\mathbf{p} = \mathbf{x}_1 + t(\mathbf{x}_2 - \mathbf{x}_1) \quad \text{for some scalar } t.

Then PO1=∣t∣⋅∣x2−x1∣PO_1 = |t| \cdot |\mathbf{x}_2 - \mathbf{x}_1| and PO2=∣1−t∣⋅∣x2−x1∣PO_2 = |1 - t| \cdot |\mathbf{x}_2 - \mathbf{x}_1|.

From the ratio (taking PP beyond O2O_2 when r1>r2r_1 > r_2, so t>1t > 1):

tt−1=r1r2  ⟹  r2t=r1(t−1)  ⟹  t(r2−r1)=−r1  ⟹  t=r1r1−r2\frac{t}{t - 1} = \frac{r_1}{r_2} \implies r_2 t = r_1(t - 1) \implies t(r_2 - r_1) = -r_1 \implies t = \frac{r_1}{r_1 - r_2}

Therefore:

p=x1+r1r1−r2(x2−x1)=(r1−r2)x1+r1x2−r1x1r1−r2=r1x2−r2x1r1−r2.(Q.E.D.)\mathbf{p} = \mathbf{x}_1 + \frac{r_1}{r_1 - r_2}(\mathbf{x}_2 - \mathbf{x}_1) = \frac{(r_1 - r_2)\mathbf{x}_1 + r_1\mathbf{x}_2 - r_1\mathbf{x}_1}{r_1 - r_2} = \frac{r_1\mathbf{x}_2 - r_2\mathbf{x}_1}{r_1 - r_2}. \qquad \text{(Q.E.D.)}

Part (ii)

By the same formula, the foci are:

p=r1x2−r2x1r1−r2,q=r1x3−r3x1r1−r3,r=r2x3−r3x2r2−r3\mathbf{p} = \frac{r_1\mathbf{x}_2 - r_2\mathbf{x}_1}{r_1 - r_2}, \qquad \mathbf{q} = \frac{r_1\mathbf{x}_3 - r_3\mathbf{x}_1}{r_1 - r_3}, \qquad \mathbf{r} = \frac{r_2\mathbf{x}_3 - r_3\mathbf{x}_2}{r_2 - r_3}

To show PP, QQ, RR are collinear, we show PQ→\overrightarrow{PQ} is parallel to QR→\overrightarrow{QR}.

Compute PQ→=q−p\overrightarrow{PQ} = \mathbf{q} - \mathbf{p}:

PQ→=r1x3−r3x1r1−r3−r1x2−r2x1r1−r2\overrightarrow{PQ} = \frac{r_1\mathbf{x}_3 - r_3\mathbf{x}_1}{r_1 - r_3} - \frac{r_1\mathbf{x}_2 - r_2\mathbf{x}_1}{r_1 - r_2}

With common denominator (r1−r2)(r1−r3)(r_1 - r_2)(r_1 - r_3):

=(r1−r2)(r1x3−r3x1)−(r1−r3)(r1x2−r2x1)(r1−r2)(r1−r3)= \frac{(r_1 - r_2)(r_1\mathbf{x}_3 - r_3\mathbf{x}_1) - (r_1 - r_3)(r_1\mathbf{x}_2 - r_2\mathbf{x}_1)}{(r_1 - r_2)(r_1 - r_3)}

Expanding the numerator and collecting by x1\mathbf{x}_1, x2\mathbf{x}_2, x3\mathbf{x}_3:

  • Coefficient of x1\mathbf{x}_1: −(r1−r2)r3+(r1−r3)r2=−r1r3+r2r3+r1r2−r2r3=r1(r2−r3)-(r_1 - r_2)r_3 + (r_1 - r_3)r_2 = -r_1 r_3 + r_2 r_3 + r_1 r_2 - r_2 r_3 = r_1(r_2 - r_3)

  • Coefficient of x2\mathbf{x}_2: −(r1−r3)r1=−r1(r1−r3)-(r_1 - r_3)r_1 = -r_1(r_1 - r_3)

  • Coefficient of x3\mathbf{x}_3: (r1−r2)r1=r1(r1−r2)(r_1 - r_2)r_1 = r_1(r_1 - r_2)

So:

PQ→=r1(r1−r2)(r1−r3)[(r2−r3)x1−(r1−r3)x2+(r1−r2)x3]\overrightarrow{PQ} = \frac{r_1}{(r_1 - r_2)(r_1 - r_3)}\left[(r_2 - r_3)\mathbf{x}_1 - (r_1 - r_3)\mathbf{x}_2 + (r_1 - r_2)\mathbf{x}_3\right]

Compute QR→=r−q\overrightarrow{QR} = \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{q}:

QR→=r2x3−r3x2r2−r3−r1x3−r3x1r1−r3\overrightarrow{QR} = \frac{r_2\mathbf{x}_3 - r_3\mathbf{x}_2}{r_2 - r_3} - \frac{r_1\mathbf{x}_3 - r_3\mathbf{x}_1}{r_1 - r_3}

With common denominator (r1−r3)(r2−r3)(r_1 - r_3)(r_2 - r_3):

=(r1−r3)(r2x3−r3x2)−(r2−r3)(r1x3−r3x1)(r1−r3)(r2−r3)= \frac{(r_1 - r_3)(r_2\mathbf{x}_3 - r_3\mathbf{x}_2) - (r_2 - r_3)(r_1\mathbf{x}_3 - r_3\mathbf{x}_1)}{(r_1 - r_3)(r_2 - r_3)}

Expanding and collecting:

  • Coefficient of x1\mathbf{x}_1: (r2−r3)r3=r3(r2−r3)(r_2 - r_3)r_3 = r_3(r_2 - r_3)

  • Coefficient of x2\mathbf{x}_2: −(r1−r3)r3=−r3(r1−r3)-(r_1 - r_3)r_3 = -r_3(r_1 - r_3)

  • Coefficient of x3\mathbf{x}_3: (r1−r3)r2−(r2−r3)r1=r1r2−r2r3−r1r2+r1r3=r3(r1−r2)(r_1 - r_3)r_2 - (r_2 - r_3)r_1 = r_1 r_2 - r_2 r_3 - r_1 r_2 + r_1 r_3 = r_3(r_1 - r_2)

So:

QR→=r3(r1−r3)(r2−r3)[(r2−r3)x1−(r1−r3)x2+(r1−r2)x3]\overrightarrow{QR} = \frac{r_3}{(r_1 - r_3)(r_2 - r_3)}\left[(r_2 - r_3)\mathbf{x}_1 - (r_1 - r_3)\mathbf{x}_2 + (r_1 - r_2)\mathbf{x}_3\right]

Both PQ→\overrightarrow{PQ} and QR→\overrightarrow{QR} are scalar multiples of the same vector v=(r2−r3)x1−(r1−r3)x2+(r1−r2)x3\mathbf{v} = (r_2 - r_3)\mathbf{x}_1 - (r_1 - r_3)\mathbf{x}_2 + (r_1 - r_2)\mathbf{x}_3, so they are parallel and PP, QQ, RR are collinear. (Q.E.D.)\qquad \text{(Q.E.D.)}

In fact PQ→=r1(r2−r3)r3(r1−r2)QR→\overrightarrow{PQ} = \dfrac{r_1(r_2 - r_3)}{r_3(r_1 - r_2)} \overrightarrow{QR}.

Part (iii)

For QQ to lie halfway between PP and RR, we need PQ→=QR→\overrightarrow{PQ} = \overrightarrow{QR}.

From part (ii), PQ→=λQR→\overrightarrow{PQ} = \lambda \overrightarrow{QR} where:

λ=r1/(r1−r2)r3/(r2−r3)=r1(r2−r3)r3(r1−r2)\lambda = \frac{r_1/(r_1 - r_2)}{r_3/(r_2 - r_3)} = \frac{r_1(r_2 - r_3)}{r_3(r_1 - r_2)}

Setting λ=1\lambda = 1:

r1(r2−r3)r3(r1−r2)=1\frac{r_1(r_2 - r_3)}{r_3(r_1 - r_2)} = 1

r1(r2−r3)=r3(r1−r2)r_1(r_2 - r_3) = r_3(r_1 - r_2)

r1r2−r1r3=r1r3−r2r3r_1 r_2 - r_1 r_3 = r_1 r_3 - r_2 r_3

r1r2+r2r3=2r1r3r_1 r_2 + r_2 r_3 = 2r_1 r_3

r2(r1+r3)=2r1r3r_2(r_1 + r_3) = 2r_1 r_3

r2=2r1r3r1+r3.r_2 = \frac{2r_1 r_3}{r_1 + r_3}.

This is the required condition: r2r_2 must be the harmonic mean of r1r_1 and r3r_3. (Q.E.D.)\qquad \text{(Q.E.D.)}

We can verify this is consistent with r1≠r2≠r3r_1 \neq r_2 \neq r_3: for example r1=1r_1 = 1, r3=3r_3 = 3 gives r2=64=32r_2 = \frac{6}{4} = \frac{3}{2}, which satisfies all three being distinct.

Examiner Notes

This was one of the least attempted questions on the paper and the average score for the question was quite low. However, there were a number of very good answers to the question. Part (i) was answered correctly by the majority of candidates, but part (ii) was approached in a much more complicated manner than necessary by many candidates, attempting to work out the equation of the line rather than comparing vectors in its direction. Where the vectors were considered, solutions could have been made clearer by better grouping of the terms. A number of solutions referred to division of vectors rather than comparing coefficients. In the final part some candidates did not identify the simplest relationship between the vectors to ensure that Q lies halfway between P and R. Generally, more complicated relationships did not lead to correct solutions to this part of the question.