Skip to content

STEP3 2006 -- Pure Mathematics

Exam: STEP3  |  Year: 2006  |  Questions: Q1—Q8  |  Total marks per question: 20

All questions are pure mathematics. Solutions are included below; examiner notes appear only where available.

QTopicDifficultyKey Techniques
1曲线分析与作图 (Curve Analysis and Sketching)Standard曲线描绘,渐近线求法,切线方程,图像分析法
2积分 (Integration)Challenging变量代换,三角恒等式,对称性利用,参数讨论
3三角级数与求和 (Trigonometric Series and Summation)Challenging幂级数展开,三角恒等式,等式两边系数比较,递推关系
4函数方程 (Functional Equations)Standard函数方程求解,麦克劳林级数,变量代换,函数复合
5复数与几何 (Complex Numbers and Geometry)Challenging复数几何意义,根与系数关系,等边三角形条件,线性变换
6极坐标与微积分 (Polar Coordinates and Calculus)Challenging极坐标微分, 三角恒等变换, 微分方程求解, 抛物线极坐标方程
7微分方程 (Differential Equations)Challenging双曲函数与指数函数转换, 二次方程因式分解, 变量分离积分, 渐近线分析
8抽象代数与微分 (Abstract Algebra and Differentiation)Challenging算子代入, 乘积法则(莱布尼茨法则), 数学归纳法, 多项式展开

Topic: 曲线分析与作图 (Curve Analysis and Sketching)  |  Difficulty: Standard  |  Marks: 20

1 Sketch the curve with cartesian equation

y=2x(x2−5)x2−4y = \frac{2x(x^2 - 5)}{x^2 - 4}

and give the equations of the asymptotes and of the tangent to the curve at the origin. Hence determine the number of real roots of the following equations:

(i) 3x(x2−5)=(x2−4)(x+3)3x(x^2 - 5) = (x^2 - 4)(x + 3);

(ii) 4x(x2−5)=(x2−4)(5x−2)4x(x^2 - 5) = (x^2 - 4)(5x - 2);

(iii) 4x2(x2−5)2=(x2−4)2(x2+1)4x^2(x^2 - 5)^2 = (x^2 - 4)^2(x^2 + 1).

Hint

y=2x(x2−5)x2−4y = \frac{2x(x^2 - 5)}{x^2 - 4} =2x−2x(x−2)(x+2)= 2x - \frac{2x}{(x - 2)(x + 2)} Asymptotes are y=2xy = 2x, x=±2x = \pm 2.

dydx=2−2(x−2)(x+2)−4x2(x−2)2(x+2)2\frac{dy}{dx} = 2 - \frac{2(x - 2)(x + 2) - 4x^2}{(x - 2)^2(x + 2)^2} (or equivalent). Equation of the tangent at O is y=5x2.y = \frac{5x}{2}.

(i) 3x(x2−5)=(x2−4)(x+3)3x(x^2 - 5) = (x^2 - 4)(x + 3) ⇔2x(x2−5)x2−4=2x3+2(x≠±2)\Leftrightarrow \frac{2x(x^2 - 5)}{x^2 - 4} = \frac{2x}{3} + 2 \quad (x \neq \pm 2) y=23x+2y = \frac{2}{3}x + 2 cuts the sketched curve in three points, so three roots.

(ii) 4x(x2−5)=(x2−4)(5x−2)4x(x^2 - 5) = (x^2 - 4)(5x - 2) ⇔2x(x2−5)x2−4=5x2−1(x≠±2)\Leftrightarrow \frac{2x(x^2 - 5)}{x^2 - 4} = \frac{5x}{2} - 1 \quad (x \neq \pm 2) y=5x2−1y = \frac{5x}{2} - 1 passes through the intersection of x=2x = 2 and y=2xy = 2x and is parallel to y=5x2y = \frac{5x}{2} so just one root.

(iii) 4x2(x2−5)2=(x2−4)2(x2+1)4x^2(x^2 - 5)^2 = (x^2 - 4)^2(x^2 + 1) ⇔2x(x2−5)x2−4=±(x2+1)(x≠±2)\Leftrightarrow \frac{2x(x^2 - 5)}{x^2 - 4} = \pm \sqrt{(x^2 + 1)} \quad (x \neq \pm 2) y=±(x2+1)y = \pm \sqrt{(x^2 + 1)} has two branches with asymptotes y=±xy = \pm x, so there are six roots.

Model Solution

Asymptotes and basic features. We perform polynomial long division:

y=2x(x2−5)x2−4=2x−2xx2−4=2x−2x(x−2)(x+2).y = \frac{2x(x^2 - 5)}{x^2 - 4} = 2x - \frac{2x}{x^2 - 4} = 2x - \frac{2x}{(x-2)(x+2)}.

So there is an oblique asymptote y=2xy = 2x and vertical asymptotes x=2x = 2 and x=−2x = -2.

Behaviour near asymptotes. As x→2−x \to 2^-, the numerator 2x(x2−5)→−42x(x^2-5) \to -4 and (x−2)(x+2)→0−(x-2)(x+2) \to 0^-, so y→+∞y \to +\infty. As x→2+x \to 2^+, (x−2)(x+2)→0+(x-2)(x+2) \to 0^+, so y→−∞y \to -\infty. Similarly, as x→−2−x \to -2^-, y→−∞y \to -\infty and as x→−2+x \to -2^+, y→+∞y \to +\infty.

Tangent at the origin. We compute the derivative:

dydx=ddx[2x−2xx2−4]=2−2(x2−4)−2x⋅2x(x2−4)2=2+2(x2+4)(x2−4)2.\frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{d}{dx}\left[2x - \frac{2x}{x^2-4}\right] = 2 - \frac{2(x^2-4) - 2x \cdot 2x}{(x^2-4)^2} = 2 + \frac{2(x^2+4)}{(x^2-4)^2}.

At x=0x = 0: dydx=2+816=52\frac{dy}{dx} = 2 + \frac{8}{16} = \frac{5}{2}.

The tangent at the origin is y=52xy = \frac{5}{2}x.

Key points. y=0y = 0 when x=0x = 0 or x=±5x = \pm\sqrt{5}. Since dydx>0\frac{dy}{dx} > 0 wherever defined (the second term is always positive), the curve is strictly increasing on each continuous branch.

At x=−2+ϵx = -2 + \epsilon with small ϵ>0\epsilon > 0: numerator ≈2(−2)(4−5)=4>0\approx 2(-2)(4-5) = 4 > 0, denominator =(ϵ−4)(ϵ)≈−4ϵ<0= (\epsilon - 4)(\epsilon) \approx -4\epsilon < 0, so y→−∞y \to -\infty. At x=2−ϵx = 2 - \epsilon: numerator ≈2(2)(4−5)=−4\approx 2(2)(4-5) = -4, denominator =(−ϵ)(4−ϵ)≈−4ϵ<0= (-\epsilon)(4-\epsilon) \approx -4\epsilon < 0, so y→+∞y \to +\infty.

Sketch summary. On (−2,2)(-2,2), the curve goes from −∞-\infty near x=−2+x=-2^+ to +∞+\infty near x=2−x=2^-, passing through the origin with slope 52\frac{5}{2}. Since dydx>0\frac{dy}{dx}>0, the curve is increasing throughout this branch.

On (−∞,−2)(-\infty, -2): as x→−∞x \to -\infty, y→−∞y \to -\infty (below y=2xy = 2x), and as x→−2−x \to -2^-, y→+∞y \to +\infty.

On (2,+∞)(2, +\infty): as x→2+x \to 2^+, y→−∞y \to -\infty, and as x→+∞x \to +\infty, y→+∞y \to +\infty (above y=2xy = 2x).


(i) Dividing both sides of 3x(x2−5)=(x2−4)(x+3)3x(x^2-5) = (x^2-4)(x+3) by 32(x2−4)\frac{3}{2}(x^2-4) (valid for x≠±2x \neq \pm 2):

2x(x2−5)x2−4=2(x+3)3=23x+2.\frac{2x(x^2-5)}{x^2-4} = \frac{2(x+3)}{3} = \frac{2}{3}x + 2.

So we need the intersection of y=2x(x2−5)x2−4y = \frac{2x(x^2-5)}{x^2-4} with the line y=23x+2y = \frac{2}{3}x + 2.

The line y=23x+2y = \frac{2}{3}x + 2 has slope 23\frac{2}{3} (less than the asymptotic slope 2), passes through (0,2)(0, 2), and crosses the vertical asymptotes at (2,103)(2, \frac{10}{3}) and (−2,23)(-2, \frac{2}{3}).

On each of the three branches of the curve, the line crosses the curve exactly once (the line has smaller slope than 2, so it crosses each branch). Therefore there are 3 real roots.


(ii) Dividing both sides of 4x(x2−5)=(x2−4)(5x−2)4x(x^2-5) = (x^2-4)(5x-2) by 2(x2−4)2(x^2-4):

2x(x2−5)x2−4=5x−22=52x−1.\frac{2x(x^2-5)}{x^2-4} = \frac{5x-2}{2} = \frac{5}{2}x - 1.

The line y=52x−1y = \frac{5}{2}x - 1 is parallel to the tangent at the origin y=52xy = \frac{5}{2}x, shifted down by 1.

At x=2x = 2: the line gives y=4y = 4. On the curve, as x→2+x \to 2^+, y→−∞y \to -\infty. The line and the asymptote y=2xy = 2x meet at x=2x = 2 (where y=4y = 4), and the line passes through the point (2,4)(2, 4) — but x=2x = 2 is excluded. Since the line is parallel to the oblique asymptote but shifted, and the curve approaches y=2xy = 2x from the correct side on each outer branch, the line only crosses the middle branch (near the origin). Therefore there is 1 real root.


(iii) Dividing both sides of 4x2(x2−5)2=(x2−4)2(x2+1)4x^2(x^2-5)^2 = (x^2-4)^2(x^2+1) by (x2−4)2(x^2-4)^2:

(2x(x2−5)x2−4)2=x2+1⟹2x(x2−5)x2−4=±x2+1.\left(\frac{2x(x^2-5)}{x^2-4}\right)^2 = x^2 + 1 \quad \Longrightarrow \quad \frac{2x(x^2-5)}{x^2-4} = \pm\sqrt{x^2+1}.

We need the intersections of the curve with y=x2+1y = \sqrt{x^2+1} (upper branch, above the x-axis, asymptotic to y=∣x∣y = |x|) and y=−x2+1y = -\sqrt{x^2+1} (lower branch, asymptotic to y=−∣x∣y = -|x|).

On the interval (−2,2)(-2, 2), the curve passes from −∞-\infty to +∞+\infty, crossing both upper and lower branches of y=±x2+1y = \pm\sqrt{x^2+1}, giving 2 intersections.

On (−∞,−2)(-\infty, -2), the curve rises from −∞-\infty to +∞+\infty, crossing both branches, giving 2 intersections.

On (2,+∞)(2, +\infty), the curve rises from −∞-\infty to +∞+\infty, crossing both branches, giving 2 intersections.

Therefore there are 6 real roots.


Topic: 积分 (Integration)  |  Difficulty: Challenging  |  Marks: 20

2 Let

I=∫−12π12πcos⁡2θ1−sin⁡θsin⁡2α dθandJ=∫−12π12πsec⁡2θ1+tan⁡2θcos⁡22α dθI = \int_{-\frac{1}{2}\pi}^{\frac{1}{2}\pi} \frac{\cos^2 \theta}{1 - \sin \theta \sin 2\alpha} \, d\theta \quad \text{and} \quad J = \int_{-\frac{1}{2}\pi}^{\frac{1}{2}\pi} \frac{\sec^2 \theta}{1 + \tan^2 \theta \cos^2 2\alpha} \, d\theta

where 0<α<14π0 < \alpha < \frac{1}{4}\pi.

(i) Show that I=∫−12π12πcos⁡2θ1+sin⁡θsin⁡2α dθI = \int_{-\frac{1}{2}\pi}^{\frac{1}{2}\pi} \frac{\cos^2 \theta}{1 + \sin \theta \sin 2\alpha} \, d\theta and hence that 2I=∫−12π12π21+tan⁡2θcos⁡22α dθ2I = \int_{-\frac{1}{2}\pi}^{\frac{1}{2}\pi} \frac{2}{1 + \tan^2 \theta \cos^2 2\alpha} \, d\theta.

(ii) Find JJ.

(iii) By considering Isin⁡22α+Jcos⁡22αI \sin^2 2\alpha + J \cos^2 2\alpha, or otherwise, show that I=12πsec⁡2αI = \frac{1}{2}\pi \sec^2 \alpha.

(iv) Evaluate II in the case 14π<α<12π\frac{1}{4}\pi < \alpha < \frac{1}{2}\pi.

Hint

First “show” by change of variable θ=−ϕ\theta = -\phi (say). Then

2I=∫−π/2π/2cos⁡2θ1+sin⁡θsin⁡2αdθ+∫−π/2π/2cos⁡2θ1−sin⁡θsin⁡2αdθ2I = \int_{-\pi/2}^{\pi/2} \frac{\cos^2 \theta}{1 + \sin \theta \sin 2\alpha} d\theta + \int_{-\pi/2}^{\pi/2} \frac{\cos^2 \theta}{1 - \sin \theta \sin 2\alpha} d\theta =∫−π/2π/22sec⁡2θ−tan⁡2θsin⁡22αdθ= \int_{-\pi/2}^{\pi/2} \frac{2}{\sec^2 \theta - \tan^2 \theta \sin^2 2\alpha} d\theta and next “show” follows.

(ii) J=sec⁡2α∫−π/2π/211+(cos⁡2αtan⁡θ)2cos⁡2αsec⁡2θdθJ = \sec 2\alpha \int_{-\pi/2}^{\pi/2} \frac{1}{1 + (\cos 2\alpha \tan \theta)^2} \cos 2\alpha \sec^2 \theta d\theta =sec⁡2α∫−π/2π/211+u2du= \sec 2\alpha \int_{-\pi/2}^{\pi/2} \frac{1}{1 + u^2} du (since cos⁡2α>0\cos 2\alpha > 0) =πsec⁡2α= \pi \sec 2\alpha

(iii) Isin⁡22α+Jcos⁡22α=πI \sin^2 2\alpha + J \cos^2 2\alpha = \pi. Result follows after use of (ii).

(iv) In this case, cos⁡2α<0\cos 2\alpha < 0, so J=−πsec⁡2αJ = -\pi \sec 2\alpha. Then I=12πcosec⁡2αI = \frac{1}{2}\pi\cosec^2\alpha.

Model Solution

Part (i). We show first that I=∫−π/2π/2cos⁡2θ1+sin⁡θsin⁡2α dθI = \int_{-\pi/2}^{\pi/2} \frac{\cos^2\theta}{1 + \sin\theta\sin 2\alpha}\,d\theta.

Substitute θ=−ϕ\theta = -\phi in the original integral for II:

I=∫π/2−π/2cos⁡2(−ϕ)1−sin⁡(−ϕ)sin⁡2α(−dϕ)=∫−π/2π/2cos⁡2ϕ1+sin⁡ϕsin⁡2α dϕ.I = \int_{\pi/2}^{-\pi/2} \frac{\cos^2(-\phi)}{1 - \sin(-\phi)\sin 2\alpha}(-d\phi) = \int_{-\pi/2}^{\pi/2} \frac{\cos^2\phi}{1 + \sin\phi\sin 2\alpha}\,d\phi.

Since ϕ\phi is a dummy variable, this equals ∫−π/2π/2cos⁡2θ1+sin⁡θsin⁡2α dθ\int_{-\pi/2}^{\pi/2} \frac{\cos^2\theta}{1 + \sin\theta\sin 2\alpha}\,d\theta. □\square

Now we add the two expressions for II:

2I=∫−π/2π/2cos⁡2θ1−sin⁡θsin⁡2α dθ+∫−π/2π/2cos⁡2θ1+sin⁡θsin⁡2α dθ2I = \int_{-\pi/2}^{\pi/2} \frac{\cos^2\theta}{1 - \sin\theta\sin 2\alpha}\,d\theta + \int_{-\pi/2}^{\pi/2} \frac{\cos^2\theta}{1 + \sin\theta\sin 2\alpha}\,d\theta

=∫−π/2π/2cos⁡2θ⋅(1+sin⁡θsin⁡2α)+(1−sin⁡θsin⁡2α)(1−sin⁡θsin⁡2α)(1+sin⁡θsin⁡2α) dθ= \int_{-\pi/2}^{\pi/2} \cos^2\theta \cdot \frac{(1 + \sin\theta\sin 2\alpha) + (1 - \sin\theta\sin 2\alpha)}{(1 - \sin\theta\sin 2\alpha)(1 + \sin\theta\sin 2\alpha)}\,d\theta

=∫−π/2π/22cos⁡2θ1−sin⁡2θsin⁡22α dθ.= \int_{-\pi/2}^{\pi/2} \frac{2\cos^2\theta}{1 - \sin^2\theta\sin^2 2\alpha}\,d\theta.

We rewrite the denominator. Since 1−sin⁡2θsin⁡22α=cos⁡2θ+sin⁡2θ(1−sin⁡22α)=cos⁡2θ+sin⁡2θcos⁡22α1 - \sin^2\theta\sin^2 2\alpha = \cos^2\theta + \sin^2\theta(1 - \sin^2 2\alpha) = \cos^2\theta + \sin^2\theta\cos^2 2\alpha:

2I=∫−π/2π/22cos⁡2θcos⁡2θ+sin⁡2θcos⁡22α dθ.2I = \int_{-\pi/2}^{\pi/2} \frac{2\cos^2\theta}{\cos^2\theta + \sin^2\theta\cos^2 2\alpha}\,d\theta.

Dividing numerator and denominator by cos⁡2θ\cos^2\theta:

2I=∫−π/2π/221+tan⁡2θcos⁡22α dθ.□2I = \int_{-\pi/2}^{\pi/2} \frac{2}{1 + \tan^2\theta\cos^2 2\alpha}\,d\theta. \qquad \square


Part (ii). We compute JJ directly. We have

J=∫−π/2π/2sec⁡2θ1+tan⁡2θcos⁡22α dθ.J = \int_{-\pi/2}^{\pi/2} \frac{\sec^2\theta}{1 + \tan^2\theta\cos^2 2\alpha}\,d\theta.

Substitute u=tan⁡θu = \tan\theta, so du=sec⁡2θ dθdu = \sec^2\theta\,d\theta. As θ\theta goes from −π/2-\pi/2 to π/2\pi/2, uu ranges from −∞-\infty to +∞+\infty:

J=∫−∞∞du1+u2cos⁡22α.J = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{du}{1 + u^2\cos^2 2\alpha}.

Since 0<α<π/40 < \alpha < \pi/4, we have cos⁡2α>0\cos 2\alpha > 0. Substituting v=ucos⁡2αv = u\cos 2\alpha, dv=cos⁡2α dudv = \cos 2\alpha\,du:

J=1cos⁡2α∫−∞∞dv1+v2=1cos⁡2α⋅π=πsec⁡2α.□J = \frac{1}{\cos 2\alpha}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{dv}{1 + v^2} = \frac{1}{\cos 2\alpha} \cdot \pi = \pi\sec 2\alpha. \qquad \square


Part (iii). From Part (i), we have 2I=∫−π/2π/221+tan⁡2θcos⁡22α dθ2I = \int_{-\pi/2}^{\pi/2} \frac{2}{1 + \tan^2\theta\cos^2 2\alpha}\,d\theta, so

I=∫−π/2π/211+tan⁡2θcos⁡22α dθ.I = \int_{-\pi/2}^{\pi/2} \frac{1}{1 + \tan^2\theta\cos^2 2\alpha}\,d\theta.

Now consider Isin⁡22α+Jcos⁡22αI\sin^2 2\alpha + J\cos^2 2\alpha:

Isin⁡22α+Jcos⁡22α=∫−π/2π/2sin⁡22α1+tan⁡2θcos⁡22α dθ+∫−π/2π/2sec⁡2θ⋅cos⁡22α1+tan⁡2θcos⁡22α dθI\sin^2 2\alpha + J\cos^2 2\alpha = \int_{-\pi/2}^{\pi/2} \frac{\sin^2 2\alpha}{1 + \tan^2\theta\cos^2 2\alpha}\,d\theta + \int_{-\pi/2}^{\pi/2} \frac{\sec^2\theta \cdot \cos^2 2\alpha}{1 + \tan^2\theta\cos^2 2\alpha}\,d\theta

=∫−π/2π/2sin⁡22α+sec⁡2θcos⁡22α1+tan⁡2θcos⁡22α dθ.= \int_{-\pi/2}^{\pi/2} \frac{\sin^2 2\alpha + \sec^2\theta\cos^2 2\alpha}{1 + \tan^2\theta\cos^2 2\alpha}\,d\theta.

Writing sec⁡2θ=1+tan⁡2θ\sec^2\theta = 1 + \tan^2\theta:

numerator=sin⁡22α+cos⁡22α+tan⁡2θcos⁡22α=1+tan⁡2θcos⁡22α.\text{numerator} = \sin^2 2\alpha + \cos^2 2\alpha + \tan^2\theta\cos^2 2\alpha = 1 + \tan^2\theta\cos^2 2\alpha.

Therefore the integrand equals 1, and

Isin⁡22α+Jcos⁡22α=∫−π/2π/21 dθ=π.I\sin^2 2\alpha + J\cos^2 2\alpha = \int_{-\pi/2}^{\pi/2} 1\,d\theta = \pi.

Substituting J=πsec⁡2αJ = \pi\sec 2\alpha from Part (ii):

Isin⁡22α+πsec⁡2α⋅cos⁡22α=πI\sin^2 2\alpha + \pi\sec 2\alpha \cdot \cos^2 2\alpha = \pi

Isin⁡22α=π−πcos⁡2α=π(1−cos⁡2α)=2πsin⁡2α.I\sin^2 2\alpha = \pi - \pi\cos 2\alpha = \pi(1 - \cos 2\alpha) = 2\pi\sin^2\alpha.

Since sin⁡22α=4sin⁡2αcos⁡2α\sin^2 2\alpha = 4\sin^2\alpha\cos^2\alpha:

I⋅4sin⁡2αcos⁡2α=2πsin⁡2αI \cdot 4\sin^2\alpha\cos^2\alpha = 2\pi\sin^2\alpha

I=2πsin⁡2α4sin⁡2αcos⁡2α=π2cos⁡2α=12πsec⁡2α.□I = \frac{2\pi\sin^2\alpha}{4\sin^2\alpha\cos^2\alpha} = \frac{\pi}{2\cos^2\alpha} = \frac{1}{2}\pi\sec^2\alpha. \qquad \square


Part (iv). When 14π<α<12π\frac{1}{4}\pi < \alpha < \frac{1}{2}\pi, we have cos⁡2α<0\cos 2\alpha < 0. In the evaluation of JJ, the integral remains positive, so

J=∫−∞∞du1+u2cos⁡22α=π∣cos⁡2α∣=−πsec⁡2α.J = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{du}{1+u^2\cos^2 2\alpha}=\frac{\pi}{|\cos 2\alpha|}=-\pi\sec 2\alpha.

The relation Isin⁡22α+Jcos⁡22α=πI\sin^2 2\alpha + J\cos^2 2\alpha = \pi still holds (the derivation in Part (iii) did not depend on the sign of cos⁡2α\cos 2\alpha). Thus

Isin⁡22α−πcos⁡2α=π,I\sin^2 2\alpha-\pi\cos 2\alpha=\pi,

so

I=π(1+cos⁡2α)sin⁡22α=π1−cos⁡2α.I=\frac{\pi(1+\cos 2\alpha)}{\sin^2 2\alpha}=\frac{\pi}{1-\cos 2\alpha}.

Using 1−cos⁡2α=2sin⁡2α1-\cos 2\alpha=2\sin^2\alpha gives

I=π2sin⁡2α=12πcosec⁡2α.□I=\frac{\pi}{2\sin^2\alpha}=\frac{1}{2}\pi\cosec^2\alpha. \qquad \square


Topic: 三角级数与求和 (Trigonometric Series and Summation)  |  Difficulty: Challenging  |  Marks: 20

3 (i) Let tan⁡x=∑n=0∞anxnandcot⁡x=1x+∑n=0∞bnxn\tan x = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_n x^n \quad \text{and} \quad \cot x = \frac{1}{x} + \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} b_n x^n for 0<x<12π0 < x < \frac{1}{2}\pi. Explain why an=0a_n = 0 for even nn. Prove the identity cot⁡x−tan⁡x≡2cot⁡2x\cot x - \tan x \equiv 2 \cot 2x and show that an=(1−2n+1)bn.a_n = (1 - 2^{n+1})b_n.

(ii) Let cosec x=1x+∑n=0∞cnxn\text{cosec } x = \frac{1}{x} + \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} c_n x^n for 0<x<12π0 < x < \frac{1}{2}\pi. By considering cot⁡x+tan⁡x\cot x + \tan x, or otherwise, show that cn=(2−n−1)bn.c_n = (2^{-n} - 1)b_n.

(iii) Show that (1+x∑n=0∞bnxn)2+x2=(1+x∑n=0∞cnxn)2.\left( 1 + x \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} b_n x^n \right)^2 + x^2 = \left( 1 + x \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} c_n x^n \right)^2. Deduce from this and the previous results that a1=1a_1 = 1, and find a3a_3.

Hint

tan⁡x\tan x is an odd function. Express both sides in terms of tan⁡x\tan x. From identity, substitute series and result follows by equating coefficients of powers of xx.

(ii) Show that cot⁡x+tan⁡x=2cosec2x\cot x + \tan x = 2 \text{cosec} 2x and follow same method.

(iii) Identity follows from 1+cot⁡2x=cosec2x1 + \cot^2 x = \text{cosec}^2 x. Equate coefficients to show that all coefficients for even nn are zero, and a1=1,a3=13a_1 = 1, a_3 = \frac{1}{3}.

Model Solution

Part (i). Since tan⁡x\tan x is an odd function (tan⁡(−x)=−tan⁡x\tan(-x) = -\tan x), its Maclaurin series contains only odd powers of xx. Therefore an=0a_n = 0 for all even nn.

We prove the identity cot⁡x−tan⁡x=2cot⁡2x\cot x - \tan x = 2\cot 2x. Writing everything in terms of sin⁡x\sin x and cos⁡x\cos x:

cot⁡x−tan⁡x=cos⁡xsin⁡x−sin⁡xcos⁡x=cos⁡2x−sin⁡2xsin⁡xcos⁡x=cos⁡2x12sin⁡2x=2cot⁡2x.□\cot x - \tan x = \frac{\cos x}{\sin x} - \frac{\sin x}{\cos x} = \frac{\cos^2 x - \sin^2 x}{\sin x \cos x} = \frac{\cos 2x}{\frac{1}{2}\sin 2x} = 2\cot 2x. \qquad \square

Now we substitute the series. We have cot⁡x=1x+∑n=0∞bnxn\cot x = \frac{1}{x} + \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} b_n x^n and tan⁡x=∑n=0∞anxn\tan x = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_n x^n. Also:

2cot⁡2x=22x+2∑n=0∞bn(2x)n=1x+∑n=0∞2n+1bnxn.2\cot 2x = \frac{2}{2x} + 2\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} b_n (2x)^n = \frac{1}{x} + \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} 2^{n+1} b_n x^n.

Substituting into cot⁡x−tan⁡x=2cot⁡2x\cot x - \tan x = 2\cot 2x:

(1x+∑n=0∞bnxn)−∑n=0∞anxn=1x+∑n=0∞2n+1bnxn.\left(\frac{1}{x} + \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} b_n x^n\right) - \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_n x^n = \frac{1}{x} + \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} 2^{n+1} b_n x^n.

The 1x\frac{1}{x} terms cancel, and equating coefficients of xnx^n:

bn−an=2n+1bn⟹an=bn−2n+1bn=(1−2n+1)bn.□b_n - a_n = 2^{n+1} b_n \quad \Longrightarrow \quad a_n = b_n - 2^{n+1} b_n = (1 - 2^{n+1}) b_n. \qquad \square


Part (ii). We show that cot⁡x+tan⁡x=2cosec⁡2x\cot x + \tan x = 2\cosec 2x:

cot⁡x+tan⁡x=cos⁡xsin⁡x+sin⁡xcos⁡x=cos⁡2x+sin⁡2xsin⁡xcos⁡x=112sin⁡2x=2sin⁡2x=2cosec⁡2x.□\cot x + \tan x = \frac{\cos x}{\sin x} + \frac{\sin x}{\cos x} = \frac{\cos^2 x + \sin^2 x}{\sin x \cos x} = \frac{1}{\frac{1}{2}\sin 2x} = \frac{2}{\sin 2x} = 2\cosec 2x. \qquad \square

Substituting the series: cosec⁡x=1x+∑n=0∞cnxn\cosec x = \frac{1}{x} + \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} c_n x^n, so

2cosec⁡2x=22x+2∑n=0∞cn(2x)n=1x+∑n=0∞2n+1cnxn.2\cosec 2x = \frac{2}{2x} + 2\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} c_n (2x)^n = \frac{1}{x} + \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} 2^{n+1} c_n x^n.

From the identity cot⁡x+tan⁡x=2cosec⁡2x\cot x + \tan x = 2\cosec 2x:

(1x+∑bnxn)+∑anxn=1x+∑2n+1cnxn.\left(\frac{1}{x} + \sum b_n x^n\right) + \sum a_n x^n = \frac{1}{x} + \sum 2^{n+1} c_n x^n.

Equating coefficients of xnx^n:

bn+an=2n+1cn.b_n + a_n = 2^{n+1} c_n.

From Part (i), an=(1−2n+1)bna_n = (1 - 2^{n+1})b_n, so:

bn+(1−2n+1)bn=2n+1cnb_n + (1 - 2^{n+1})b_n = 2^{n+1} c_n

(2−2n+1)bn=2n+1cn(2 - 2^{n+1})b_n = 2^{n+1} c_n

cn=2−2n+12n+1bn=(2−n−1)bn.□c_n = \frac{2 - 2^{n+1}}{2^{n+1}} b_n = (2^{-n} - 1) b_n. \qquad \square


Part (iii). We use the identity 1+cot⁡2x=cosec⁡2x1 + \cot^2 x = \cosec^2 x. With cot⁡x=1x+∑bnxn=1x(1+x∑bnxn)\cot x = \frac{1}{x} + \sum b_n x^n = \frac{1}{x}(1 + x\sum b_n x^n) and cosec⁡x=1x(1+x∑cnxn)\cosec x = \frac{1}{x}(1 + x\sum c_n x^n):

1+1x2(1+x∑bnxn)2=1x2(1+x∑cnxn)2.1 + \frac{1}{x^2}\left(1 + x\sum b_n x^n\right)^2 = \frac{1}{x^2}\left(1 + x\sum c_n x^n\right)^2.

Multiplying through by x2x^2:

x2+(1+x∑bnxn)2=(1+x∑cnxn)2.□x^2 + \left(1 + x\sum b_n x^n\right)^2 = \left(1 + x\sum c_n x^n\right)^2. \qquad \square

Now we expand and equate coefficients. Let B(x)=x∑n=0∞bnxn=∑n=0∞bnxn+1B(x) = x\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} b_n x^n = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} b_n x^{n+1} and C(x)=x∑n=0∞cnxn=∑n=0∞cnxn+1C(x) = x\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} c_n x^n = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} c_n x^{n+1}.

The equation becomes:

x2+1+2B(x)+B(x)2=1+2C(x)+C(x)2x^2 + 1 + 2B(x) + B(x)^2 = 1 + 2C(x) + C(x)^2

x2+2B(x)+B(x)2=2C(x)+C(x)2.x^2 + 2B(x) + B(x)^2 = 2C(x) + C(x)^2.

From Part (ii), cn=(2−n−1)bnc_n = (2^{-n}-1)b_n. Equating coefficients of xn+1x^{n+1} on both sides (for n≥0n \geq 0):

For the coefficient of x1x^1 (n=0n = 0): LHS gives 2b02b_0 (from 2B2B), RHS gives 2c02c_0. Since c0=(20−1)b0=0c_0 = (2^0 - 1)b_0 = 0, we get 2b0=02b_0 = 0, so b0=0b_0 = 0. Then a0=(1−2)b0=0a_0 = (1-2)b_0 = 0 (consistent with a0=0a_0 = 0 since tan⁡0=0\tan 0 = 0).

For the coefficient of x2x^2 (n=1n = 1): from x2x^2 on LHS, plus 2b12b_1 from 2B2B, plus b02b_0^2 from B2B^2; from RHS, 2c12c_1 from 2C2C, plus c02c_0^2 from C2C^2. Since b0=c0=0b_0 = c_0 = 0:

1+2b1=2c1=2(2−1−1)b1=2(−12)b1=−b1.1 + 2b_1 = 2c_1 = 2(2^{-1}-1)b_1 = 2(-\tfrac{1}{2})b_1 = -b_1.

So 1+2b1=−b11 + 2b_1 = -b_1, giving 3b1=−13b_1 = -1, hence b1=−13b_1 = -\frac{1}{3}.

Then a1=(1−22)b1=(−3)(−13)=1a_1 = (1 - 2^2)b_1 = (-3)(-\frac{1}{3}) = 1. So a1=1a_1 = 1. □\square

For the coefficient of x4x^4 (n=3n = 3): we need b2b_2 first. Since cot⁡x\cot x is an odd function minus 1x\frac{1}{x}, i.e., cot⁡x−1x\cot x - \frac{1}{x} is odd, we have bn=0b_n = 0 for even nn. So b2=0b_2 = 0.

B(x)=b0x+b1x2+b2x3+b3x4+⋯B(x) = b_0 x + b_1 x^2 + b_2 x^3 + b_3 x^4 + \cdots. Since b0=b2=0b_0 = b_2 = 0: B(x)=b1x2+b3x4+⋯B(x) = b_1 x^2 + b_3 x^4 + \cdots.

B(x)2=b12x4+⋯B(x)^2 = b_1^2 x^4 + \cdots.

Coefficient of x4x^4: LHS gives 2b3+b122b_3 + b_1^2; RHS gives 2c3+c122c_3 + c_1^2 (and c2=(2−2−1)b2=0c_2 = (2^{-2}-1)b_2 = 0).

We have c1=(2−1−1)b1=−12b1=16c_1 = (2^{-1}-1)b_1 = -\frac{1}{2}b_1 = \frac{1}{6}, and c3=(2−3−1)b3=−78b3c_3 = (2^{-3}-1)b_3 = -\frac{7}{8}b_3.

2b3+b12=2c3+c122b_3 + b_1^2 = 2c_3 + c_1^2

2b3+19=−74b3+1362b_3 + \frac{1}{9} = -\frac{7}{4}b_3 + \frac{1}{36}

2b3+74b3=136−19=1−436=−1122b_3 + \frac{7}{4}b_3 = \frac{1}{36} - \frac{1}{9} = \frac{1-4}{36} = -\frac{1}{12}

154b3=−112\frac{15}{4}b_3 = -\frac{1}{12}

b3=−112⋅415=−145.b_3 = -\frac{1}{12} \cdot \frac{4}{15} = -\frac{1}{45}.

Therefore:

a3=(1−24)b3=(−15)(−145)=1545=13.a_3 = (1 - 2^4)b_3 = (-15)\left(-\frac{1}{45}\right) = \frac{15}{45} = \frac{1}{3}.


Topic: 函数方程 (Functional Equations)  |  Difficulty: Standard  |  Marks: 20

4 The function ff satisfies the identity f(x)+f(y)≡f(x+y)(*)f(x) + f(y) \equiv f(x + y) \qquad \text{(*)} for all xx and yy. Show that 2f(x)≡f(2x)2f(x) \equiv f(2x) and deduce that f′′(0)=0f''(0) = 0. By considering the Maclaurin series for f(x)f(x), find the most general function that satisfies (*). [Do not consider issues of existence or convergence of Maclaurin series in this question]

(i) By considering the function GG, defined by ln⁡(g(x))=G(x)\ln(g(x)) = G(x), find the most general function that, for all xx and yy, satisfies the identity g(x)g(y)≡g(x+y).g(x)g(y) \equiv g(x + y).

(ii) By considering the function HH, defined by h(eu)=H(u)h(e^u) = H(u), find the most general function that satisfies, for all positive xx and yy, the identity h(x)+h(y)≡h(xy).h(x) + h(y) \equiv h(xy).

(iii) Find the most general function tt that, for all xx and yy, satisfies the identity t(x)+t(y)≡t(z),t(x) + t(y) \equiv t(z), where z=x+y1−xyz = \frac{x + y}{1 - xy}.

Hint

Let x=yx = y and deduce first result. 2f(x)=f(2x)2f(x) = f(2x) ⇒2f′(x)=2f′(2x)\Rightarrow 2f'(x) = 2f'(2x) ⇒2f′′(x)=4f′′(2x)\Rightarrow 2f''(x) = 4f''(2x) then put x=0x = 0 to get f(0)=0,f′′(0)=0f(0) = 0, f''(0) = 0. Similarly all higher order derivatives are zero, so by Maclaurin the most general function is cxcx, where cc is a constant.

(i) Use properties of logs to show that G(x)+G(y)=G(x+y)G(x) + G(y) = G(x + y). Deduce that g(x)=ecxg(x) = e^{cx}.

(ii) Show that H(u)+H(v)=H(u+v)H(u) + H(v) = H(u + v) so h(x)=cln⁡xh(x) = c \ln x.

(iii) Let T(x)=t(tan⁡x)T(x) = t(\tan x). Deduce that t(x)=carctan⁡xt(x) = c \arctan x.

Model Solution

Main result. Setting y=xy = x in f(x)+f(y)=f(x+y)f(x) + f(y) = f(x+y):

2f(x)=f(2x).□2f(x) = f(2x). \qquad \square

Differentiating 2f(x)=f(2x)2f(x) = f(2x) with respect to xx:

2f′(x)=2f′(2x)⟹f′(x)=f′(2x).2f'(x) = 2f'(2x) \quad \Longrightarrow \quad f'(x) = f'(2x).

Differentiating again:

f′′(x)=2f′′(2x).f''(x) = 2f''(2x).

Setting x=0x = 0: f′′(0)=2f′′(0)f''(0) = 2f''(0), so f′′(0)=0f''(0) = 0. □\square

Maclaurin series. Setting y=0y = 0 in the original equation: f(x)+f(0)=f(x)f(x) + f(0) = f(x), so f(0)=0f(0) = 0.

From f′(x)=f′(2x)f'(x) = f'(2x), differentiating nn times: f(n)(x)=2nf(n)(2x)f^{(n)}(x) = 2^n f^{(n)}(2x). Setting x=0x = 0:

f(n)(0)=2nf(n)(0)⟹(1−2n)f(n)(0)=0.f^{(n)}(0) = 2^n f^{(n)}(0) \quad \Longrightarrow \quad (1 - 2^n)f^{(n)}(0) = 0.

For n≥2n \geq 2, 1−2n≠01 - 2^n \neq 0, so f(n)(0)=0f^{(n)}(0) = 0. The Maclaurin series is:

f(x)=f(0)+f′(0)x+∑n=2∞f(n)(0)n!xn=f′(0)x.f(x) = f(0) + f'(0)x + \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} \frac{f^{(n)}(0)}{n!}x^n = f'(0)x.

So the most general function is f(x)=cxf(x) = cx for some constant cc. □\square


Part (i). Let G(x)=ln⁡g(x)G(x) = \ln g(x), so g(x)=eG(x)g(x) = e^{G(x)}. The identity g(x)g(y)=g(x+y)g(x)g(y) = g(x+y) becomes:

eG(x)eG(y)=eG(x+y)⟹G(x)+G(y)=G(x+y).e^{G(x)} e^{G(y)} = e^{G(x+y)} \quad \Longrightarrow \quad G(x) + G(y) = G(x+y).

By the main result, G(x)=cxG(x) = cx for some constant cc. Therefore:

g(x)=ecxg(x) = e^{cx}

for some constant cc. □\square


Part (ii). Let H(u)=h(eu)H(u) = h(e^u), so h(x)=H(ln⁡x)h(x) = H(\ln x). The identity h(x)+h(y)=h(xy)h(x) + h(y) = h(xy) for positive x,yx, y becomes:

H(ln⁡x)+H(ln⁡y)=H(ln⁡x+ln⁡y).H(\ln x) + H(\ln y) = H(\ln x + \ln y).

Setting u=ln⁡xu = \ln x, v=ln⁡yv = \ln y (where u,vu, v range over all reals):

H(u)+H(v)=H(u+v).H(u) + H(v) = H(u + v).

By the main result, H(u)=cuH(u) = cu for some constant cc. Therefore:

h(x)=H(ln⁡x)=cln⁡xh(x) = H(\ln x) = c\ln x

for some constant cc. □\square


Part (iii). Let x=tan⁡sx = \tan s and y=tan⁡ty = \tan t, so that z=x+y1−xy=tan⁡s+tan⁡t1−tan⁡stan⁡t=tan⁡(s+t)z = \frac{x+y}{1-xy} = \frac{\tan s + \tan t}{1 - \tan s \tan t} = \tan(s+t).

Define T(s)=t(tan⁡s)T(s) = t(\tan s). The identity t(x)+t(y)=t(z)t(x) + t(y) = t(z) becomes:

T(s)+T(t)=T(s+t).T(s) + T(t) = T(s + t).

By the main result, T(s)=csT(s) = cs for some constant cc. Therefore:

t(x)=T(arctan⁡x)=carctan⁡xt(x) = T(\arctan x) = c\arctan x

for some constant cc. □\square


Topic: 复数与几何 (Complex Numbers and Geometry)  |  Difficulty: Challenging  |  Marks: 20

5 Show that the distinct complex numbers α\alpha, β\beta and γ\gamma represent the vertices of an equilateral triangle (in clockwise or anti-clockwise order) if and only if

α2+β2+γ2−βγ−γα−αβ=0.\alpha^2 + \beta^2 + \gamma^2 - \beta\gamma - \gamma\alpha - \alpha\beta = 0.

Show that the roots of the equation

z3+az2+bz+c=0(*)z^3 + az^2 + bz + c = 0 \qquad \text{(*)}

represent the vertices of an equilateral triangle if and only if a2=3ba^2 = 3b.

Under the transformation z=pw+qz = pw + q, where pp and qq are given complex numbers with p≠0p \neq 0, the equation (*) becomes

w3+Aw2+Bw+C=0.(**)w^3 + Aw^2 + Bw + C = 0. \qquad \text{(**)}

Show that if the roots of equation (*) represent the vertices of an equilateral triangle, then the roots of equation (**) also represent the vertices of an equilateral triangle.

Hint

There are essentially two different configurations, corresponding to clockwise and anticlockwise arrangements of α,β,γ\alpha, \beta, \gamma taken in order. In what follows, ω=−1+3i2\omega = \frac{-1 + \sqrt{3}i}{2}, the cube root of unity with modulus 1 and argument 2π3\frac{2\pi}{3}; 1+ω+ω2=01 + \omega + \omega^2 = 0 (*) is assumed.

Then either β−γ=ω(γ−α)\beta - \gamma = \omega(\gamma - \alpha) and β−γ=ω2(γ−α)\beta - \gamma = \omega^2(\gamma - \alpha) expresses equality of adjacent sides and the correct angle between them for each of the two cases; by SAS this establishes an equilateral triangle. These two are equivalent to [β−γ−ω(γ−α)][β−γ−ω2(γ−α)]=0[\beta - \gamma - \omega(\gamma - \alpha)][\beta - \gamma - \omega^2(\gamma - \alpha)] = 0. The required form is an expanded version of this, using (*). NB It is essential to be clear that the argument works both ways. If α,β,γ\alpha, \beta, \gamma are the roots of the equation given, −a=α+β+γ,b=αβ+βγ+γα,c=−αβγ-a = \alpha + \beta + \gamma, b = \alpha\beta + \beta\gamma + \gamma\alpha, c = -\alpha\beta\gamma. Then a2−3b=α2+β2+γ2−αβ−βγ−γαa^2 - 3b = \alpha^2 + \beta^2 + \gamma^2 - \alpha\beta - \beta\gamma - \gamma\alpha so a2−3b=0a^2 - 3b = 0 is equivalent to the expression in the first part. Result follows. z→pwz \rightarrow pw is an enlargement combined with rotation, so object and image are similar. pw→pw+qpw \rightarrow pw + q is a translation so object and image are congruent. Hence under the composition z→pw+qz \rightarrow pw + q object and image are similar. Result follows. Aliter. Substitute z=pw+qz = pw + q in the first equation, and simplify. Compare coefficients to determine A and B in terms of a, b and c. Then a2−3b=0⇒A2−3B=0a^2 - 3b = 0 \Rightarrow A^2 - 3B = 0, so result follows.

Model Solution

Part 1. We show that the condition α2+β2+γ2−βγ−γα−αβ=0\alpha^2 + \beta^2 + \gamma^2 - \beta\gamma - \gamma\alpha - \alpha\beta = 0 is equivalent to the vertices forming an equilateral triangle.

Let ω=−1+3i2\omega = \frac{-1 + \sqrt{3}i}{2}, a primitive cube root of unity. Then ω3=1\omega^3 = 1, ω2+ω+1=0\omega^2 + \omega + 1 = 0, and ∣ω∣=1|\omega| = 1.

The three vertices form an equilateral triangle (in some cyclic order) if and only if two adjacent sides are equal in length and meet at angle π3\frac{\pi}{3}. In the complex plane, rotating a vector by 2π3\frac{2\pi}{3} is multiplication by ω\omega. So the vertices in anti-clockwise order α,β,γ\alpha, \beta, \gamma form an equilateral triangle if and only if

β−α=ω(γ−β),\beta - \alpha = \omega(\gamma - \beta),

and in clockwise order if and only if

β−α=ω2(γ−β).\beta - \alpha = \omega^2(\gamma - \beta).

Combining both cases: the triangle is equilateral if and only if

[β−α−ω(γ−β)][β−α−ω2(γ−β)]=0.[\beta - \alpha - \omega(\gamma - \beta)][\beta - \alpha - \omega^2(\gamma - \beta)] = 0.

We expand this product. Writing u=β−αu = \beta - \alpha and v=γ−βv = \gamma - \beta:

[u−ωv][u−ω2v]=u2−(ω+ω2)uv+ω3v2.[u - \omega v][u - \omega^2 v] = u^2 - (\omega + \omega^2)uv + \omega^3 v^2.

Since ω+ω2=−1\omega + \omega^2 = -1 and ω3=1\omega^3 = 1:

=u2+uv+v2.= u^2 + uv + v^2.

Now substituting back u=β−αu = \beta - \alpha, v=γ−βv = \gamma - \beta:

u2=(β−α)2=α2−2αβ+β2u^2 = (\beta - \alpha)^2 = \alpha^2 - 2\alpha\beta + \beta^2

uv=(β−α)(γ−β)=βγ−β2−αγ+αβuv = (\beta - \alpha)(\gamma - \beta) = \beta\gamma - \beta^2 - \alpha\gamma + \alpha\beta

v2=(γ−β)2=β2−2βγ+γ2v^2 = (\gamma - \beta)^2 = \beta^2 - 2\beta\gamma + \gamma^2

Summing:

u2+uv+v2=α2+β2+γ2−αβ−βγ−γα.u^2 + uv + v^2 = \alpha^2 + \beta^2 + \gamma^2 - \alpha\beta - \beta\gamma - \gamma\alpha.

Hence the triangle is equilateral if and only if

α2+β2+γ2−βγ−γα−αβ=0\alpha^2 + \beta^2 + \gamma^2 - \beta\gamma - \gamma\alpha - \alpha\beta = 0

as required. □\square


Part 2. Let the roots of z3+az2+bz+c=0z^3 + az^2 + bz + c = 0 \qquad \text{(*)} be α,β,γ\alpha, \beta, \gamma. By Vieta’s relations:

α+β+γ=−a,αβ+βγ+γα=b.\alpha + \beta + \gamma = -a, \qquad \alpha\beta + \beta\gamma + \gamma\alpha = b.

We compute α2+β2+γ2\alpha^2 + \beta^2 + \gamma^2. From (α+β+γ)2(\alpha + \beta + \gamma)^2:

(α+β+γ)2=α2+β2+γ2+2(αβ+βγ+γα)(\alpha + \beta + \gamma)^2 = \alpha^2 + \beta^2 + \gamma^2 + 2(\alpha\beta + \beta\gamma + \gamma\alpha)

a2=α2+β2+γ2+2ba^2 = \alpha^2 + \beta^2 + \gamma^2 + 2b

α2+β2+γ2=a2−2b.\alpha^2 + \beta^2 + \gamma^2 = a^2 - 2b.

Therefore:

α2+β2+γ2−αβ−βγ−γα=(a2−2b)−b=a2−3b.\alpha^2 + \beta^2 + \gamma^2 - \alpha\beta - \beta\gamma - \gamma\alpha = (a^2 - 2b) - b = a^2 - 3b.

By Part 1, the roots form an equilateral triangle if and only if this equals zero, i.e., a2=3ba^2 = 3b. □\square


Part 3. We substitute z=pw+qz = pw + q into equation \qquad \text{(*)}:

(pw+q)3+a(pw+q)2+b(pw+q)+c=0.(pw + q)^3 + a(pw + q)^2 + b(pw + q) + c = 0.

Expanding:

p3w3+3p2qw2+3pq2w+q3+a(p2w2+2pqw+q2)+b(pw+q)+c=0.p^3w^3 + 3p^2qw^2 + 3pq^2w + q^3 + a(p^2w^2 + 2pqw + q^2) + b(pw + q) + c = 0.

Collecting by powers of ww:

p3w3+(3p2q+ap2)w2+(3pq2+2apq+bp)w+(q3+aq2+bq+c)=0.p^3w^3 + (3p^2q + ap^2)w^2 + (3pq^2 + 2apq + bp)w + (q^3 + aq^2 + bq + c) = 0.

Dividing through by p3p^3 (since p≠0p \neq 0):

w3+3q+apw2+3q2+2aq+bp2w+q3+aq2+bq+cp3=0.(**)w^3 + \frac{3q + a}{p}w^2 + \frac{3q^2 + 2aq + b}{p^2}w + \frac{q^3 + aq^2 + bq + c}{p^3} = 0. \qquad \text{(**)}

So the coefficients of \qquad \text{(**)} are:

A=3q+ap,B=3q2+2aq+bp2.A = \frac{3q + a}{p}, \qquad B = \frac{3q^2 + 2aq + b}{p^2}.

We compute A2−3BA^2 - 3B:

A2=(3q+a)2p2=9q2+6aq+a2p2A^2 = \frac{(3q + a)^2}{p^2} = \frac{9q^2 + 6aq + a^2}{p^2}

3B=3(3q2+2aq+b)p2=9q2+6aq+3bp23B = \frac{3(3q^2 + 2aq + b)}{p^2} = \frac{9q^2 + 6aq + 3b}{p^2}

A2−3B=(9q2+6aq+a2)−(9q2+6aq+3b)p2=a2−3bp2.A^2 - 3B = \frac{(9q^2 + 6aq + a^2) - (9q^2 + 6aq + 3b)}{p^2} = \frac{a^2 - 3b}{p^2}.

If the roots of \qquad \text{(*)} form an equilateral triangle, then by Part 2 we have a2−3b=0a^2 - 3b = 0, so A2−3B=0A^2 - 3B = 0, i.e., A2=3BA^2 = 3B. By Part 2 applied to equation \qquad \text{()}, the roots of \qquad \text{()} also form an equilateral triangle.

Remark. Geometrically, the transformation z↦pw+qz \mapsto pw + q is a rotation-scaling (multiplication by pp) followed by a translation (addition of qq). Both are similarity transformations, so the image of an equilateral triangle is again equilateral. □\square


Topic: 极坐标与微积分 (Polar Coordinates and Calculus)  |  Difficulty: Challenging  |  Marks: 20

6 Show that in polar coordinates the gradient of any curve at the point (r,θ)(r, \theta) is

drdθtan⁡θ+rdrdθ−rtan⁡θ.\frac{\frac{\mathrm{d}r}{\mathrm{d}\theta} \tan \theta + r}{\frac{\mathrm{d}r}{\mathrm{d}\theta} - r \tan \theta}.

A mirror is designed so that if an incident ray of light is parallel to a fixed line LL the reflected ray passes through a fixed point OO on LL. Prove that the mirror intersects any plane containing LL in a parabola. You should assume that the angle between the incident ray and the normal to the mirror is the same as the angle between the reflected ray and the normal.

Hint

6 x=rcos⁡θ,y=rsin⁡θ,r=r(θ)x = r \cos \theta, y = r \sin \theta, r = r(\theta)

⇒dydx=drdθsin⁡θ+rcos⁡θdrdθcos⁡θ−rsin⁡θ\Rightarrow \frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{\frac{dr}{d\theta} \sin \theta + r \cos \theta}{\frac{dr}{d\theta} \cos \theta - r \sin \theta}

and result follows.

The tangent makes angle θ2\frac{\theta}{2} with the fixed line. Put t=tan⁡θ2t=\tan\frac{\theta}{2}. Then

t=drdθtan⁡θ+rdrdθ−rtan⁡θ,tan⁡θ=2t1−t2.t=\frac{\frac{dr}{d\theta}\tan\theta+r}{\frac{dr}{d\theta}-r\tan\theta}, \qquad \tan\theta=\frac{2t}{1-t^2}.

This reduces to

drdθ=−rt=−rcot⁡θ2.\frac{dr}{d\theta}=-\frac{r}{t}=-r\cot\frac{\theta}{2}.

Hence

ln⁡r=−2ln⁡sin⁡θ2+C,\ln r=-2\ln\sin\frac{\theta}{2}+C,

so r=ℓ/(1−cos⁡θ)r=\ell/(1-\cos\theta), the polar equation of a parabola with focus at OO.

Model Solution

Polar gradient formula. Using x=rcos⁡θx = r\cos\theta and y=rsin⁡θy = r\sin\theta with r=r(θ)r = r(\theta):

dxdθ=drdθcos⁡θ−rsin⁡θ,dydθ=drdθsin⁡θ+rcos⁡θ.\frac{dx}{d\theta} = \frac{dr}{d\theta}\cos\theta - r\sin\theta, \qquad \frac{dy}{d\theta} = \frac{dr}{d\theta}\sin\theta + r\cos\theta.

Therefore:

dydx=dy/dθdx/dθ=drdθsin⁡θ+rcos⁡θdrdθcos⁡θ−rsin⁡θ.\frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{dy/d\theta}{dx/d\theta} = \frac{\frac{dr}{d\theta}\sin\theta + r\cos\theta}{\frac{dr}{d\theta}\cos\theta - r\sin\theta}.

Dividing numerator and denominator by cos⁡θ\cos\theta:

dydx=drdθtan⁡θ+rdrdθ−rtan⁡θ.□\frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{\frac{dr}{d\theta}\tan\theta + r}{\frac{dr}{d\theta} - r\tan\theta}. \qquad \square


Mirror problem. Place the origin at OO and let LL be a ray from OO. We use polar coordinates (r,θ)(r, \theta) centred at OO. An incident ray parallel to LL travels in the direction of LL (the direction θ=0\theta = 0). The reflected ray passes through OO.

At the point P=(r,θ)P = (r, \theta) on the mirror, the reflected ray points from PP toward OO, i.e., in the direction θ+π\theta + \pi. The incident ray is horizontal (direction 0). By the law of reflection, the angles of incidence and reflection with the normal are equal.

Let ψ\psi be the angle the normal at PP makes with the horizontal. The angle of incidence is ∣ψ∣|\psi| and the angle of reflection is ∣ψ−(θ+π)∣|\psi - (\theta + \pi)|. Setting these equal (with appropriate sign conventions), the bisector of the angle between the incident direction (0) and reflected direction (θ+π\theta + \pi) must be the normal direction.

The angle bisector of directions 00 and θ+π\theta + \pi is at angle 0+(θ+π)2=θ2+π2\frac{0 + (\theta + \pi)}{2} = \frac{\theta}{2} + \frac{\pi}{2} (or its supplement). So the normal to the curve at PP has direction θ2+π2\frac{\theta}{2} + \frac{\pi}{2}.

The tangent to the curve at PP has direction θ2\frac{\theta}{2} (perpendicular to the normal). Using the polar gradient formula, the tangent direction at (r,θ)(r,\theta) satisfies

tan⁡θ2=drdθtan⁡θ+rdrdθ−rtan⁡θ.\tan\frac{\theta}{2}=\frac{\frac{dr}{d\theta}\tan\theta+r}{\frac{dr}{d\theta}-r\tan\theta}.

Let t=tan⁡θ2t=\tan\frac{\theta}{2}. Since tan⁡θ=2t1−t2\tan\theta=\frac{2t}{1-t^2}, this gives

drdθ(2t1−t2−t)=−r(1+2t21−t2)\frac{dr}{d\theta}\left(\frac{2t}{1-t^2} - t\right) = -r\left(1 + \frac{2t^2}{1-t^2}\right)

LHS: 2t−t(1−t2)1−t2=2t−t+t31−t2=t+t31−t2=t(1+t2)1−t2\frac{2t - t(1-t^2)}{1-t^2} = \frac{2t - t + t^3}{1-t^2} = \frac{t + t^3}{1-t^2} = \frac{t(1+t^2)}{1-t^2}

RHS: −r⋅1−t2+2t21−t2=−r⋅1+t21−t2-r\cdot\frac{1-t^2+2t^2}{1-t^2} = -r\cdot\frac{1+t^2}{1-t^2}

So drdθ⋅t(1+t2)1−t2=−r⋅1+t21−t2\frac{dr}{d\theta} \cdot \frac{t(1+t^2)}{1-t^2} = -r \cdot \frac{1+t^2}{1-t^2}

Dividing both sides by 1+t21−t2\frac{1+t^2}{1-t^2}:

tdrdθ=−rt \frac{dr}{d\theta} = -r

drdθ=−rt=−rtan⁡(θ/2)\frac{dr}{d\theta} = -\frac{r}{t} = -\frac{r}{\tan(\theta/2)}

drr=−cot⁡θ2 dθ=−cos⁡(θ/2)sin⁡(θ/2) dθ.\frac{dr}{r} = -\cot\frac{\theta}{2}\,d\theta = -\frac{\cos(\theta/2)}{\sin(\theta/2)}\,d\theta.

Integrating:

ln⁡r=−2ln⁡∣sin⁡θ2∣+c=ln⁡1sin⁡2(θ/2)+c.\ln r = -2\ln\left|\sin\frac{\theta}{2}\right| + c = \ln\frac{1}{\sin^2(\theta/2)} + c.

Exponentiating:

r=Asin⁡2(θ/2)=2A1−cos⁡θr = \frac{A}{\sin^2(\theta/2)} = \frac{2A}{1 - \cos\theta}

where A=ec>0A = e^c > 0. Setting ℓ=2A\ell = 2A:

r=ℓ1−cos⁡θ.r = \frac{\ell}{1 - \cos\theta}.

Converting to Cartesian: r−rcos⁡θ=ℓr - r\cos\theta = \ell, so x2+y2=ℓ+x\sqrt{x^2+y^2} = \ell + x. Squaring: x2+y2=ℓ2+2ℓx+x2x^2 + y^2 = \ell^2 + 2\ell x + x^2, hence y2=ℓ2+2ℓx=2ℓ(x+ℓ/2)y^2 = \ell^2 + 2\ell x = 2\ell(x + \ell/2).

This is the equation of a parabola with focus at the origin and directrix x=−ℓx = -\ell (the fixed line LL), confirming that the mirror has parabolic cross-section. □\square


Topic: 微分方程 (Differential Equations)  |  Difficulty: Challenging  |  Marks: 20

7 (i) Solve the equation u2+2usinh⁡x−1=0u^2 + 2u \sinh x - 1 = 0 giving uu in terms of xx.

Find the solution of the differential equation

(dydx)2+2dydxsinh⁡x−1=0\left( \frac{dy}{dx} \right)^2 + 2 \frac{dy}{dx} \sinh x - 1 = 0

that satisfies y=0y = 0 and dydx>0\frac{dy}{dx} > 0 at x=0x = 0.

(ii) Find the solution, not identically zero, of the differential equation

sinh⁡y(dydx)2+2dydx−sinh⁡y=0\sinh y \left( \frac{dy}{dx} \right)^2 + 2 \frac{dy}{dx} - \sinh y = 0

that satisfies y=0y = 0 at x=0x = 0, expressing your solution in the form cosh⁡y=f(x)\cosh y = f(x). Show that the asymptotes to the solution curve are y=±(−x+ln⁡4)y = \pm(-x + \ln 4).

Hint

7 (i) Express sinh⁡x\sinh x in terms of exponentials, factorise and solve to get

u=−exu = -e^x or u=e−xu = e^{-x} (or −cosh⁡x±sinh⁡x-\cosh x \pm \sinh x).

Use both of these as equal to dydx\frac{dy}{dx} and integration to get alternative solutions

y=−e±x+cy = -e^{\pm x} + c.

From the given conditions the particular integral is

y=1−e−xy = 1 - e^{-x}.

(ii) Solve the quadratic as before to get either

u=−1±cosh⁡ysinh⁡y (or equivalent)u = \frac{-1 \pm \cosh y}{\sinh y} \text{ (or equivalent)}

⇒dxdy=sinh⁡y−1±cosh⁡y\Rightarrow \frac{dx}{dy} = \frac{\sinh y}{-1 \pm \cosh y}

⇒x=ln⁡(cosh⁡y−1)+c1\Rightarrow x = \ln(\cosh y - 1) + c_1 or x=−ln⁡(cosh⁡y+1)+c2x = -\ln(\cosh y + 1) + c_2

Only the first can satisfy the conditions x=0,y=0x = 0, y = 0; then we have

x=ln⁡21+cosh⁡yx = \ln \frac{2}{1 + \cosh y}

⇒cosh⁡y=2e−x−1\Rightarrow \cosh y = 2e^{-x} - 1

This is undefined for x>0x > 0.

For x→−∞⇒cosh⁡y→∞x \to -\infty \Rightarrow \cosh y \to \infty, and there will be two branches, corresponding to y→±∞y \to \pm \infty, as cosh⁡\cosh is an even function.

So x→−∞⇒cosh⁡y→∞⇒y→∞⇒ey≈4e−x⇒y=−x+ln⁡4x \to -\infty \Rightarrow \cosh y \to \infty \Rightarrow y \to \infty \Rightarrow e^y \approx 4e^{-x} \Rightarrow y = -x + \ln 4 in one case, and similarly y=x−ln⁡4y = x - \ln 4 in the other.

Model Solution

Part (i). We solve u2+2usinh⁡x−1=0u^2 + 2u\sinh x - 1 = 0. Using the quadratic formula:

u=−2sinh⁡x±4sinh⁡2x+42=−sinh⁡x±sinh⁡2x+1=−sinh⁡x±cosh⁡x.u = \frac{-2\sinh x \pm \sqrt{4\sinh^2 x + 4}}{2} = -\sinh x \pm \sqrt{\sinh^2 x + 1} = -\sinh x \pm \cosh x.

Since cosh⁡x=ex+e−x2\cosh x = \frac{e^x + e^{-x}}{2} and sinh⁡x=ex−e−x2\sinh x = \frac{e^x - e^{-x}}{2}:

u=−sinh⁡x+cosh⁡x=e−xoru=−sinh⁡x−cosh⁡x=−ex.u = -\sinh x + \cosh x = e^{-x} \qquad \text{or} \qquad u = -\sinh x - \cosh x = -e^x.

For the differential equation (dydx)2+2dydxsinh⁡x−1=0\left(\frac{dy}{dx}\right)^2 + 2\frac{dy}{dx}\sinh x - 1 = 0, we set u=dydxu = \frac{dy}{dx}, giving:

dydx=e−xordydx=−ex.\frac{dy}{dx} = e^{-x} \qquad \text{or} \qquad \frac{dy}{dx} = -e^x.

Case 1: dydx=e−x\frac{dy}{dx} = e^{-x}. Integrating: y=−e−x+Cy = -e^{-x} + C. At x=0x = 0: y=−1+C=0y = -1 + C = 0, so C=1C = 1. Also dydx∣x=0=1>0\frac{dy}{dx}\big|_{x=0} = 1 > 0. So y=1−e−xy = 1 - e^{-x}.

Case 2: dydx=−ex\frac{dy}{dx} = -e^x. At x=0x = 0: dydx=−1<0\frac{dy}{dx} = -1 < 0, violating dydx>0\frac{dy}{dx} > 0. Rejected.

The solution is y=1−e−xy = 1 - e^{-x}. □\square


Part (ii). We solve sinh⁡y(dydx)2+2dydx−sinh⁡y=0\sinh y\left(\frac{dy}{dx}\right)^2 + 2\frac{dy}{dx} - \sinh y = 0 as a quadratic in dydx\frac{dy}{dx}:

dydx=−2±4+4sinh⁡2y2sinh⁡y=−2±2cosh⁡y2sinh⁡y=−1±cosh⁡ysinh⁡y.\frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{-2 \pm \sqrt{4 + 4\sinh^2 y}}{2\sinh y} = \frac{-2 \pm 2\cosh y}{2\sinh y} = \frac{-1 \pm \cosh y}{\sinh y}.

Since dydx\frac{dy}{dx} must be real and we need the reciprocal dxdy\frac{dx}{dy} to integrate:

Case 1: dxdy=sinh⁡ycosh⁡y−1\frac{dx}{dy} = \frac{\sinh y}{\cosh y - 1}. Integrating: substitute w=cosh⁡y−1w = \cosh y - 1, dw=sinh⁡y dydw = \sinh y\,dy:

x=∫dww=ln⁡∣cosh⁡y−1∣+C1.x = \int \frac{dw}{w} = \ln|\cosh y - 1| + C_1.

At (x,y)=(0,0)(x, y) = (0, 0): cosh⁡0−1=0\cosh 0 - 1 = 0, so ln⁡0\ln 0 is undefined. This case cannot satisfy the initial condition (except via a limiting argument; the solution is only valid for y≠0y \neq 0).

Case 2: dxdy=sinh⁡y−1−cosh⁡y=−sinh⁡y1+cosh⁡y\frac{dx}{dy} = \frac{\sinh y}{-1 - \cosh y} = -\frac{\sinh y}{1 + \cosh y}. Using 1+cosh⁡y=2cosh⁡2(y/2)1 + \cosh y = 2\cosh^2(y/2) and sinh⁡y=2sinh⁡(y/2)cosh⁡(y/2)\sinh y = 2\sinh(y/2)\cosh(y/2):

dxdy=−2sinh⁡(y/2)cosh⁡(y/2)2cosh⁡2(y/2)=−tanh⁡y2.\frac{dx}{dy} = -\frac{2\sinh(y/2)\cosh(y/2)}{2\cosh^2(y/2)} = -\tanh\frac{y}{2}.

Integrating:

x=−2ln⁡∣cosh⁡y2∣+C2.x = -2\ln\left|\cosh\frac{y}{2}\right| + C_2.

At (0,0)(0, 0): 0=−2ln⁡1+C20 = -2\ln 1 + C_2, so C2=0C_2 = 0. Therefore x=−2ln⁡cosh⁡y2x = -2\ln\cosh\frac{y}{2}.

This gives cosh⁡y2=e−x/2\cosh\frac{y}{2} = e^{-x/2}, so cosh⁡y=2cosh⁡2y2−1=2e−x−1\cosh y = 2\cosh^2\frac{y}{2} - 1 = 2e^{-x} - 1.

cosh⁡y=2e−x−1.□\cosh y = 2e^{-x} - 1. \qquad \square

Domain. For cosh⁡y≥1\cosh y \geq 1, we need 2e−x−1≥12e^{-x} - 1 \geq 1, i.e., e−x≥1e^{-x} \geq 1, so x≤0x \leq 0. The solution exists only for x≤0x \leq 0.

Asymptotic behaviour. As x→−∞x \to -\infty: cosh⁡y=2e−x−1→∞\cosh y = 2e^{-x} - 1 \to \infty, so ∣y∣→∞|y| \to \infty.

For y>0y > 0: cosh⁡y≈ey2\cosh y \approx \frac{e^y}{2} for large yy. So ey2≈2e−x\frac{e^y}{2} \approx 2e^{-x}, giving ey≈4e−xe^y \approx 4e^{-x}, hence y≈−x+ln⁡4y \approx -x + \ln 4.

For y<0y < 0: cosh⁡y=cosh⁡(−y)≈e−y2\cosh y = \cosh(-y) \approx \frac{e^{-y}}{2}, so e−y2≈2e−x\frac{e^{-y}}{2} \approx 2e^{-x}, giving e−y≈4e−xe^{-y} \approx 4e^{-x}, hence −y≈−x+ln⁡4-y \approx -x + \ln 4, i.e., y≈x−ln⁡4y \approx x - \ln 4.

The asymptotes are y=−x+ln⁡4y = -x + \ln 4 and y=x−ln⁡4y = x - \ln 4. □\square


Topic: 抽象代数与微分 (Abstract Algebra and Differentiation)  |  Difficulty: Challenging  |  Marks: 20

8 Δ\Delta is an operation that takes polynomials in xx to polynomials in xx; that is, given any polynomial h(x)h(x), there is a polynomial called Δh(x)\Delta h(x) which is obtained from h(x)h(x) using the rules that define Δ\Delta. These rules are as follows:

(i) Δx=1\Delta x = 1;

(ii) Δ(f(x)+g(x))=Δf(x)+Δg(x)\Delta(f(x) + g(x)) = \Delta f(x) + \Delta g(x) for any polynomials f(x)f(x) and g(x)g(x);

(iii) Δ(λf(x))=λΔf(x)\Delta(\lambda f(x)) = \lambda \Delta f(x) for any constant λ\lambda and any polynomial f(x)f(x);

(iv) Δ(f(x)g(x))=f(x)Δg(x)+g(x)Δf(x)\Delta(f(x)g(x)) = f(x)\Delta g(x) + g(x)\Delta f(x) for any polynomials f(x)f(x) and g(x)g(x).

Using these rules show that, if f(x)f(x) is a polynomial of degree zero (that is, a constant), then Δf(x)=0\Delta f(x) = 0. Calculate Δx2\Delta x^2 and Δx3\Delta x^3.

Prove that Δh(x)≡dh(x)dx\Delta h(x) \equiv \frac{dh(x)}{dx} for any polynomial h(x)h(x). You should make it clear whenever you use one of the above rules in your proof.

Hint

8 Use (iv) with f(x)≡1f(x) \equiv 1, g(x)≡1g(x) \equiv 1 to show that Δ1=0\Delta 1 = 0. Use (iii) with λ≡k\lambda \equiv k, f(x)≡1f(x) \equiv 1 to show that Δk=0\Delta k = 0. By (iv), (i) Δx2=2x\Delta x^2 = 2x; ditto Δx3=3x2\Delta x^3 = 3x^2. Now show Δkxn=knxn−1\Delta kx^n = knx^{n-1} by induction. Initial step is Δk=0\Delta k = 0; inductive hypothesis is that ΔkxN=kNxN−1\Delta kx^N = kNx^{N-1}. Use (iii) and (iv) with hypothesis to show that ΔkxN+1=k(N+1)xN\Delta kx^{N+1} = k(N+1)x^N. Now express any Pk(x)P_k(x), a polynomial of degree k, as a sum of such powers, and so use (ii) to establish required result.

Model Solution

Constants have zero image. We first show Δ(1)=0\Delta(1) = 0. By rule (iv) with f(x)=1f(x) = 1 and g(x)=1g(x) = 1:

Δ(1⋅1)=1⋅Δ(1)+1⋅Δ(1)=2Δ(1).\Delta(1 \cdot 1) = 1 \cdot \Delta(1) + 1 \cdot \Delta(1) = 2\Delta(1).

But Δ(1⋅1)=Δ(1)\Delta(1 \cdot 1) = \Delta(1), so Δ(1)=2Δ(1)\Delta(1) = 2\Delta(1), hence Δ(1)=0\Delta(1) = 0.

For a general constant kk, by rule (iii) with λ=k\lambda = k and f(x)=1f(x) = 1:

Δ(k)=Δ(k⋅1)=kΔ(1)=k⋅0=0.□\Delta(k) = \Delta(k \cdot 1) = k\Delta(1) = k \cdot 0 = 0. \qquad \square


Computing Δx2\Delta x^2 and Δx3\Delta x^3. By rule (iv) with f(x)=xf(x) = x and g(x)=xg(x) = x:

Δ(x2)=Δ(x⋅x)=xΔ(x)+xΔ(x)=2xΔ(x).\Delta(x^2) = \Delta(x \cdot x) = x\Delta(x) + x\Delta(x) = 2x\Delta(x).

By rule (i), Δx=1\Delta x = 1, so Δ(x2)=2x\Delta(x^2) = 2x. □\square

By rule (iv) with f(x)=xf(x) = x and g(x)=x2g(x) = x^2:

Δ(x3)=Δ(x⋅x2)=xΔ(x2)+x2Δ(x)=x⋅2x+x2⋅1=3x2.□\Delta(x^3) = \Delta(x \cdot x^2) = x\Delta(x^2) + x^2\Delta(x) = x \cdot 2x + x^2 \cdot 1 = 3x^2. \qquad \square


General proof by induction. We prove that Δh(x)=dh(x)dx\Delta h(x) = \frac{dh(x)}{dx} for every polynomial h(x)h(x).

Claim: For all n≥0n \geq 0 and all constants kk, Δ(kxn)=knxn−1\Delta(kx^n) = knx^{n-1}.

Base case (n=0n = 0): Δ(k)=0=k⋅0⋅x−1\Delta(k) = 0 = k \cdot 0 \cdot x^{-1}. (Already proved above.) ✓\checkmark

Inductive step: Assume Δ(kxN)=kNxN−1\Delta(kx^N) = kNx^{N-1} for some N≥0N \geq 0. We show Δ(kxN+1)=k(N+1)xN\Delta(kx^{N+1}) = k(N+1)x^N.

By rule (iv) with f(x)=xf(x) = x and g(x)=kxNg(x) = kx^N:

Δ(kxN+1)=Δ(x⋅kxN)=x⋅Δ(kxN)+kxN⋅Δ(x).\Delta(kx^{N+1}) = \Delta(x \cdot kx^N) = x \cdot \Delta(kx^N) + kx^N \cdot \Delta(x).

Applying rule (i): Δ(x)=1\Delta(x) = 1. Applying the inductive hypothesis: Δ(kxN)=kNxN−1\Delta(kx^N) = kNx^{N-1}.

Δ(kxN+1)=x⋅kNxN−1+kxN⋅1=kNxN+kxN=k(N+1)xN.✓\Delta(kx^{N+1}) = x \cdot kNx^{N-1} + kx^N \cdot 1 = kNx^N + kx^N = k(N+1)x^N. \qquad \checkmark

By induction, Δ(kxn)=knxn−1\Delta(kx^n) = knx^{n-1} for all n≥0n \geq 0 and all constants kk.

Extension to general polynomials. Let h(x)=∑i=0nkixih(x) = \sum_{i=0}^{n} k_i x^i be any polynomial. By rule (ii) (additivity) applied repeatedly:

Δh(x)=Δ(∑i=0nkixi)=∑i=0nΔ(kixi)=∑i=0nkiixi−1.\Delta h(x) = \Delta\left(\sum_{i=0}^{n} k_i x^i\right) = \sum_{i=0}^{n} \Delta(k_i x^i) = \sum_{i=0}^{n} k_i i x^{i-1}.

By rule (iii) (linearity), each Δ(kixi)=kiΔ(xi)\Delta(k_i x^i) = k_i \Delta(x^i), and we have shown Δ(xi)=ixi−1\Delta(x^i) = ix^{i-1}.

The right-hand side is exactly dhdx\frac{dh}{dx}. Therefore Δh(x)≡dh(x)dx\Delta h(x) \equiv \frac{dh(x)}{dx} for every polynomial h(x)h(x). □\square