This lecture introduces hyperbolic functions, which arise naturally from certain rational function integrals. These functions share many properties with trigonometric functions but exhibit exponential growth behaviour. We’ll explore their definitions, properties, and applications.
Consider the following integrals that appear frequently in calculus:
∫ d x x 2 ± a 2 \int \frac{dx}{\sqrt{x^2 \pm a^2}} ∫ x 2 ± a 2 d x
These integrals have important applications in physics and engineering, particularly in:
The length of a catenary curve (hanging chain)
The motion of a pendulum
Problems in special relativity
Their solutions lead us naturally to hyperbolic functions.
Definition: Hyperbolic Functions
For any real number x x x , we define:
sinh x = e x − e − x 2 (hyperbolic sine) \sinh x = \frac{e^x - e^{-x}}{2} \quad \text{(hyperbolic sine)} sinh x = 2 e x − e − x (hyperbolic sine)
cosh x = e x + e − x 2 (hyperbolic cosine) \cosh x = \frac{e^x + e^{-x}}{2} \quad \text{(hyperbolic cosine)} cosh x = 2 e x + e − x (hyperbolic cosine)
tanh x = sinh x cosh x = e x − e − x e x + e − x (hyperbolic tangent) \tanh x = \frac{\sinh x}{\cosh x} = \frac{e^x - e^{-x}}{e^x + e^{-x}} \quad \text{(hyperbolic tangent)} tanh x = c o s h x s i n h x = e x + e − x e x − e − x (hyperbolic tangent)
Exercise: Deriving Other Hyperbolic Functions
Just as trigonometric functions have reciprocal relationships:
sec θ = 1 cos θ , csc θ = 1 sin θ , cot θ = cos θ sin θ \sec \theta = \frac{1}{\cos \theta}, \quad \csc \theta = \frac{1}{\sin \theta}, \quad \cot \theta = \frac{\cos \theta}{\sin \theta} sec θ = c o s θ 1 , csc θ = s i n θ 1 , cot θ = s i n θ c o s θ
derive expressions for their hyperbolic counterparts:
sech x \operatorname{sech} x sech x (hyperbolic secant)
csch x \operatorname{csch} x csch x (hyperbolic cosecant)
coth x \coth x coth x (hyperbolic cotangent)
Solution:
sech x = 1 cosh x = 2 e x + e − x \operatorname{sech} x = \dfrac{1}{\cosh x} = \dfrac{2}{e^x + e^{-x}} sech x = cosh x 1 = e x + e − x 2
csch x = 1 sinh x = 2 e x − e − x \operatorname{csch} x = \dfrac{1}{\sinh x} = \dfrac{2}{e^x - e^{-x}} csch x = sinh x 1 = e x − e − x 2
coth x = cosh x sinh x = e x + e − x e x − e − x \coth x = \dfrac{\cosh x}{\sinh x} = \dfrac{e^x + e^{-x}}{e^x - e^{-x}} coth x = sinh x cosh x = e x − e − x e x + e − x
Key Properties:
sech x \operatorname{sech} x sech x is even and 0 < sech x ≤ 1 0 < \operatorname{sech} x \leq 1 0 < sech x ≤ 1
csch x \operatorname{csch} x csch x is odd and has vertical asymptotes at x = 0 x = 0 x = 0
coth x \coth x coth x is odd and has vertical asymptotes at x = 0 x = 0 x = 0
∣ coth x ∣ > 1 |\coth x| > 1 ∣ coth x ∣ > 1 for all x ≠ 0 x \neq 0 x = 0
cosh x ≥ 1 \cosh x \geq 1 cosh x ≥ 1 for all real x x x
sinh x \sinh x sinh x is odd: sinh ( − x ) = − sinh ( x ) \sinh(-x) = -\sinh(x) sinh ( − x ) = − sinh ( x )
cosh x \cosh x cosh x is even: cosh ( − x ) = cosh ( x ) \cosh(-x) = \cosh(x) cosh ( − x ) = cosh ( x )
sinh x \sinh x sinh x is similar to sin x \sin x sin x but grows exponentially as ∣ x ∣ → ∞ |x| \to \infty ∣ x ∣ → ∞
cosh x \cosh x cosh x is similar to cos x \cos x cos x but has minimum value 1 and grows exponentially
tanh x \tanh x tanh x has horizontal asymptotes at y = ± 1 y = \pm 1 y = ± 1
Step 1. Using the definition:
e x − e − x 2 = 3 \frac{e^x - e^{-x}}{2} = 3 2 e x − e − x = 3
Step 2. Let y = e x y = e^x y = e x . Then e − x = 1 y e^{-x} = \dfrac{1}{y} e − x = y 1 :
y − 1 y = 6 y - \frac{1}{y} = 6 y − y 1 = 6
Step 3. Rearrange to standard form:
y 2 − 6 y − 1 = 0 y^2 - 6y - 1 = 0 y 2 − 6 y − 1 = 0
Step 4. Solve quadratic equation:
y = 6 ± 36 + 4 2 = 3 ± 10 y = \frac{6 \pm \sqrt{36 + 4}}{2} = 3 \pm \sqrt{10} y = 2 6 ± 36 + 4 = 3 ± 10
Step 5. Since y = e x y = e^x y = e x , and we need y > 0 y > 0 y > 0 :
x = ln ( 3 + 10 ) x = \ln(3 + \sqrt{10}) x = ln ( 3 + 10 )
Exercise
The curve C 1 C_1 C 1 has equation y = 3 sinh 2 x y = 3\sinh 2x y = 3 sinh 2 x , and the curve C 2 C_2 C 2 has equation y = 13 − 3 e 2 x y = 13 - 3e^{2x} y = 13 − 3 e 2 x .
(a) Sketch the graphs of curves C 1 C_1 C 1 and C 2 C_2 C 2 on one set of axes, giving the equation of any asymptote and the coordinates of points where the curves cross the axes.
(b) Hence solve the equation 3 sinh 2 x = 13 − 3 e 2 x 3\sinh 2x = 13 - 3e^{2x} 3 sinh 2 x = 13 − 3 e 2 x , giving your answer in the form 1 2 ln k \frac{1}{2}\ln k 2 1 ln k , where k k k is an integer.
Solution:
(a) For curve C 1 : y = 3 sinh 2 x C_1: y = 3\sinh 2x C 1 : y = 3 sinh 2 x :
When x = 0 x = 0 x = 0 : y = 0 y = 0 y = 0 , so ( 0 , 0 ) (0,0) ( 0 , 0 ) is on the curve
As x → ∞ x \to \infty x → ∞ : y → ∞ y \to \infty y → ∞ exponentially
As x → − ∞ x \to -\infty x → − ∞ : y → − ∞ y \to -\infty y → − ∞ exponentially
Odd function, symmetric about origin
For curve C 2 : y = 13 − 3 e 2 x C_2: y = 13 - 3e^{2x} C 2 : y = 13 − 3 e 2 x :
When x = 0 x = 0 x = 0 : y = 13 − 3 = 10 y = 13 - 3 = 10 y = 13 − 3 = 10 , so ( 0 , 10 ) (0,10) ( 0 , 10 ) is on the curve
As x → ∞ x \to \infty x → ∞ : y → − ∞ y \to -\infty y → − ∞
As x → − ∞ x \to -\infty x → − ∞ : y → 13 y \to 13 y → 13 (horizontal asymptote)
Crosses y y y -axis at ( 0 , 10 ) (0,10) ( 0 , 10 )
(b) Using the definition of sinh x \sinh x sinh x :
3 sinh 2 x = 13 − 3 e 2 x 3\sinh 2x = 13 - 3e^{2x} 3 sinh 2 x = 13 − 3 e 2 x
3 ( e 2 x − e − 2 x 2 ) = 13 − 3 e 2 x 3\left(\frac{e^{2x} - e^{-2x}}{2}\right) = 13 - 3e^{2x} 3 ( 2 e 2 x − e − 2 x ) = 13 − 3 e 2 x
3 e 2 x − 3 e − 2 x 2 = 13 − 3 e 2 x \frac{3e^{2x} - 3e^{-2x}}{2} = 13 - 3e^{2x} 2 3 e 2 x − 3 e − 2 x = 13 − 3 e 2 x
3 e 2 x − 3 e − 2 x = 26 − 6 e 2 x 3e^{2x} - 3e^{-2x} = 26 - 6e^{2x} 3 e 2 x − 3 e − 2 x = 26 − 6 e 2 x
9 e 2 x − 3 e − 2 x = 26 9e^{2x} - 3e^{-2x} = 26 9 e 2 x − 3 e − 2 x = 26
9 e 4 x − 3 = 26 e 2 x 9e^{4x} - 3 = 26e^{2x} 9 e 4 x − 3 = 26 e 2 x
9 e 4 x − 26 e 2 x − 3 = 0 9e^{4x} - 26e^{2x} - 3 = 0 9 e 4 x − 26 e 2 x − 3 = 0
Let y = e 2 x y = e^{2x} y = e 2 x , then:
9 y 2 − 26 y − 3 = 0 ⇒ ( 3 y − 1 ) ( 3 y + 3 ) = 0 9y^2 - 26y - 3 = 0 \Rightarrow (3y-1)(3y+3) = 0 9 y 2 − 26 y − 3 = 0 ⇒ ( 3 y − 1 ) ( 3 y + 3 ) = 0
Therefore y = 1 3 y = \dfrac{1}{3} y = 3 1 or y = − 1 y = -1 y = − 1 .
Since y = e 2 x > 0 y = e^{2x} > 0 y = e 2 x > 0 , we have y = 1 3 y = \dfrac{1}{3} y = 3 1 .
Hence e 2 x = 1 3 e^{2x} = \dfrac{1}{3} e 2 x = 3 1 , so x = 1 2 ln ( 1 3 ) = − 1 2 ln 3 x = \dfrac{1}{2}\ln\!\left(\dfrac{1}{3}\right) = -\dfrac{1}{2}\ln 3 x = 2 1 ln ( 3 1 ) = − 2 1 ln 3 .
To find the domain of an inverse function:
Check if the original function is one-to-one (injective)
If not, restrict the domain to make it one-to-one
The range of the original function becomes the domain of the inverse function
The domain of the original function becomes the range of the inverse function
For example, cosh x \cosh x cosh x is not one-to-one as it’s even, so we restrict its domain to [ 0 , ∞ ) [0,\infty) [ 0 , ∞ ) to define cosh − 1 \cosh^{-1} cosh − 1 .
For each of the six hyperbolic functions, determine:
Whether the function is one-to-one on R \mathbb{R} R
If not, what domain restriction is needed
The domain of its inverse function
Function One-to-one? Restriction needed Domain of inverse sinh x \sinh x sinh x Yes None − ∞ < x < ∞ -\infty < x < \infty − ∞ < x < ∞ cosh x \cosh x cosh x No (even) x ≥ 0 x \geq 0 x ≥ 0 x ≥ 1 x \geq 1 x ≥ 1 tanh x \tanh x tanh x Yes None − 1 < x < 1 -1 < x < 1 − 1 < x < 1 sech x \operatorname{sech} x sech x No (even) x ≥ 0 x \geq 0 x ≥ 0 0 < x ≤ 1 0 < x \leq 1 0 < x ≤ 1 csch x \operatorname{csch} x csch x No (asymptote) x < 0 x < 0 x < 0 or x > 0 x > 0 x > 0 x ≠ 0 x \neq 0 x = 0 coth x \coth x coth x No (asymptote) x < 0 x < 0 x < 0 or x > 0 x > 0 x > 0 x < − 1 x < -1 x < − 1 or x > 1 x > 1 x > 1
Explanation:
sinh x \sinh x sinh x : Strictly increasing everywhere, so inverse exists for all x ∈ R x \in \mathbb{R} x ∈ R
cosh x \cosh x cosh x : Even function, restrict to x ≥ 0 x \geq 0 x ≥ 0 where minimum value is 1
tanh x \tanh x tanh x : Strictly increasing with horizontal asymptotes at y = ± 1 y = \pm 1 y = ± 1
sech x \operatorname{sech} x sech x : Even function, restrict to x ≥ 0 x \geq 0 x ≥ 0 where 0 < y ≤ 1 0 < y \leq 1 0 < y ≤ 1
csch x \operatorname{csch} x csch x : Has vertical asymptote at x = 0 x = 0 x = 0 , need to consider x < 0 x < 0 x < 0 and x > 0 x > 0 x > 0 separately
coth x \coth x coth x : Has vertical asymptote at x = 0 x = 0 x = 0 and horizontal asymptotes at y = ± 1 y = \pm 1 y = ± 1
Definition: Inverse Hyperbolic Functions
For appropriate domains:
sinh − 1 x = ln ( x + x 2 + 1 ) \sinh^{-1} x = \ln(x + \sqrt{x^2 + 1}) sinh − 1 x = ln ( x + x 2 + 1 )
cosh − 1 x = ln ( x + x 2 − 1 ) , x ≥ 1 \cosh^{-1} x = \ln(x + \sqrt{x^2 - 1}), \quad x \geq 1 cosh − 1 x = ln ( x + x 2 − 1 ) , x ≥ 1
tanh − 1 x = 1 2 ln ( 1 + x 1 − x ) , ∣ x ∣ < 1 \tanh^{-1} x = \frac{1}{2}\ln\!\left(\frac{1+x}{1-x}\right), \quad |x| < 1 tanh − 1 x = 2 1 ln ( 1 − x 1 + x ) , ∣ x ∣ < 1
For any real x x x :
cosh x = cos ( i x ) \cosh x = \cos(ix) cosh x = cos ( i x )
sinh x = − i sin ( i x ) \sinh x = -i\sin(ix) sinh x = − i sin ( i x )
Guided Exercise 1: Fundamental Identity
Using the relationship between hyperbolic and trigonometric functions, prove that:
cosh 2 x − sinh 2 x = 1 \cosh^2 x - \sinh^2 x = 1 cosh 2 x − sinh 2 x = 1
given that cos 2 θ + sin 2 θ = 1 \cos^2 \theta + \sin^2 \theta = 1 cos 2 θ + sin 2 θ = 1 .
Solution:
cosh 2 x − sinh 2 x = [ cos ( i x ) ] 2 − [ − i sin ( i x ) ] 2 \cosh^2 x - \sinh^2 x = [\cos(ix)]^2 - [-i\sin(ix)]^2 cosh 2 x − sinh 2 x = [ cos ( i x ) ] 2 − [ − i sin ( i x ) ] 2
= cos 2 ( i x ) + sin 2 ( i x ) = \cos^2(ix) + \sin^2(ix) = cos 2 ( i x ) + sin 2 ( i x )
= 1 = 1 = 1
Guided Exercise 2
Using the relationship with trigonometric functions, derive the addition formula for hyperbolic functions:
sinh ( x + y ) = sinh x cosh y + cosh x sinh y \sinh(x+y) = \sinh x \cosh y + \cosh x \sinh y sinh ( x + y ) = sinh x cosh y + cosh x sinh y
given that sin ( A + B ) = sin A cos B + cos A sin B \sin(A+B) = \sin A \cos B + \cos A \sin B sin ( A + B ) = sin A cos B + cos A sin B .
Solution:
sinh ( x + y ) = − i sin [ i ( x + y ) ] \sinh(x+y) = -i\sin[i(x+y)] sinh ( x + y ) = − i sin [ i ( x + y )]
= − i sin ( i x + i y ) = -i\sin(ix+iy) = − i sin ( i x + i y )
= − i [ sin ( i x ) cos ( i y ) + cos ( i x ) sin ( i y ) ] = -i[\sin(ix)\cos(iy) + \cos(ix)\sin(iy)] = − i [ sin ( i x ) cos ( i y ) + cos ( i x ) sin ( i y )]
= − i [ i sinh x cosh y + cosh x ⋅ i sinh y ] = -i[i\sinh x \cosh y + \cosh x \cdot i\sinh y] = − i [ i sinh x cosh y + cosh x ⋅ i sinh y ]
= sinh x cosh y + cosh x sinh y = \sinh x \cosh y + \cosh x \sinh y = sinh x cosh y + cosh x sinh y
1. Addition Formulas:
sinh ( x + y ) = sinh x cosh y + cosh x sinh y \sinh(x+y) = \sinh x \cosh y + \cosh x \sinh y sinh ( x + y ) = sinh x cosh y + cosh x sinh y
cosh ( x + y ) = cosh x cosh y + sinh x sinh y \cosh(x+y) = \cosh x \cosh y + \sinh x \sinh y cosh ( x + y ) = cosh x cosh y + sinh x sinh y
2. Double Angle Formulas:
sinh ( 2 x ) = 2 sinh x cosh x \sinh(2x) = 2\sinh x \cosh x sinh ( 2 x ) = 2 sinh x cosh x
cosh ( 2 x ) = cosh 2 x + sinh 2 x = 2 cosh 2 x − 1 \cosh(2x) = \cosh^2 x + \sinh^2 x = 2\cosh^2 x - 1 cosh ( 2 x ) = cosh 2 x + sinh 2 x = 2 cosh 2 x − 1
3. Pythagorean-like Identities:
1 − tanh 2 x = sech 2 x (dividing fundamental identity by cosh 2 x ) 1 - \tanh^2 x = \operatorname{sech}^2 x \quad \text{(dividing fundamental identity by } \cosh^2 x\text{)} 1 − tanh 2 x = sech 2 x (dividing fundamental identity by cosh 2 x )
coth 2 x − 1 = csch 2 x (dividing fundamental identity by sinh 2 x ) \coth^2 x - 1 = \operatorname{csch}^2 x \quad \text{(dividing fundamental identity by } \sinh^2 x\text{)} coth 2 x − 1 = csch 2 x (dividing fundamental identity by sinh 2 x )
Exercise
Use the addition formula for sinh ( x + y ) \sinh(x+y) sinh ( x + y ) to prove that:
sinh ( 2 x ) = 2 sinh x cosh x \sinh(2x) = 2\sinh x \cosh x sinh ( 2 x ) = 2 sinh x cosh x
Solution:
Let y = x y = x y = x in the addition formula:
sinh ( 2 x ) = sinh ( x + x ) \sinh(2x) = \sinh(x+x) sinh ( 2 x ) = sinh ( x + x )
= sinh x cosh x + cosh x sinh x = \sinh x \cosh x + \cosh x \sinh x = sinh x cosh x + cosh x sinh x
= 2 sinh x cosh x = 2\sinh x \cosh x = 2 sinh x cosh x
Common Pitfalls
Don’t confuse hyperbolic functions with their trigonometric counterparts
Remember that cosh x ≥ 1 \cosh x \geq 1 cosh x ≥ 1 for all real x x x
Pay attention to domain restrictions, especially for inverse functions
Be careful with signs when using complex relationships
Watch out for the differences between hyperbolic and trigonometric identities
Solve the equation:
7 sech x − tanh x = 5 7\operatorname{sech} x - \tanh x = 5 7 sech x − tanh x = 5
Give your answers in the form ln a \ln a ln a where a a a is a rational number.
Solution:
Method 1: Using the definitions
7 cosh x − sinh x cosh x = 5 \frac{7}{\cosh x} - \frac{\sinh x}{\cosh x} = 5 c o s h x 7 − c o s h x s i n h x = 5
7 − sinh x cosh x = 5 \frac{7 - \sinh x}{\cosh x} = 5 c o s h x 7 − s i n h x = 5
7 − sinh x = 5 cosh x 7 - \sinh x = 5\cosh x 7 − sinh x = 5 cosh x
7 − e x − e − x 2 = 5 e x + e − x 2 7 - \frac{e^x - e^{-x}}{2} = 5\frac{e^x + e^{-x}}{2} 7 − 2 e x − e − x = 5 2 e x + e − x
14 − ( e x − e − x ) = 5 ( e x + e − x ) 14 - (e^x - e^{-x}) = 5(e^x + e^{-x}) 14 − ( e x − e − x ) = 5 ( e x + e − x )
14 − e x + e − x = 5 e x + 5 e − x 14 - e^x + e^{-x} = 5e^x + 5e^{-x} 14 − e x + e − x = 5 e x + 5 e − x
14 − 6 e x − 4 e − x = 0 14 - 6e^x - 4e^{-x} = 0 14 − 6 e x − 4 e − x = 0
3 e 2 x − 7 e x + 2 = 0 3e^{2x} - 7e^x + 2 = 0 3 e 2 x − 7 e x + 2 = 0
Let y = e x y = e^x y = e x , then:
3 y 2 − 7 y + 2 = 0 ⇒ ( 3 y − 1 ) ( y − 2 ) = 0 3y^2 - 7y + 2 = 0 \Rightarrow (3y-1)(y-2) = 0 3 y 2 − 7 y + 2 = 0 ⇒ ( 3 y − 1 ) ( y − 2 ) = 0
Therefore y = 1 3 y = \dfrac{1}{3} y = 3 1 or y = 2 y = 2 y = 2 .
Hence x = ln ( 1 3 ) x = \ln\!\left(\dfrac{1}{3}\right) x = ln ( 3 1 ) or x = ln 2 x = \ln 2 x = ln 2 .
Method 2: Using sech 2 x + tanh 2 x = 1 \operatorname{sech}^2 x + \tanh^2 x = 1 sech 2 x + tanh 2 x = 1
( 7 sech x − 5 ) 2 = tanh 2 x (7\operatorname{sech} x - 5)^2 = \tanh^2 x ( 7 sech x − 5 ) 2 = tanh 2 x
49 sech 2 x − 70 sech x + 25 = 1 − sech 2 x 49\operatorname{sech}^2 x - 70\operatorname{sech} x + 25 = 1 - \operatorname{sech}^2 x 49 sech 2 x − 70 sech x + 25 = 1 − sech 2 x
50 sech 2 x − 70 sech x + 24 = 0 50\operatorname{sech}^2 x - 70\operatorname{sech} x + 24 = 0 50 sech 2 x − 70 sech x + 24 = 0
2 ( 5 sech x − 3 ) ( 5 sech x − 4 ) = 0 2(5\operatorname{sech} x - 3)(5\operatorname{sech} x - 4) = 0 2 ( 5 sech x − 3 ) ( 5 sech x − 4 ) = 0
sech x = 3 5 or 4 5 \operatorname{sech} x = \frac{3}{5} \text{ or } \frac{4}{5} sech x = 5 3 or 5 4
Leading to the same answers.
(a) Starting from the definitions of sinh x \sinh x sinh x and cosh x \cosh x cosh x in terms of exponentials, prove that:
cosh 2 x = 1 + 2 sinh 2 x \cosh 2x = 1 + 2\sinh^2 x cosh 2 x = 1 + 2 sinh 2 x
Solution:
RHS = 1 + 2 sinh 2 x = 1 + 2 ( e x − e − x 2 ) 2 \text{RHS} = 1 + 2\sinh^2 x = 1 + 2\left(\frac{e^x - e^{-x}}{2}\right)^2 RHS = 1 + 2 sinh 2 x = 1 + 2 ( 2 e x − e − x ) 2
= 1 + 2 ( e 2 x − 2 + e − 2 x 4 ) = 1 + 2\left(\frac{e^{2x} - 2 + e^{-2x}}{4}\right) = 1 + 2 ( 4 e 2 x − 2 + e − 2 x )
= 1 + e 2 x − 2 + e − 2 x 2 = 1 + \frac{e^{2x} - 2 + e^{-2x}}{2} = 1 + 2 e 2 x − 2 + e − 2 x
= 2 + e 2 x − 2 + e − 2 x 2 = \frac{2 + e^{2x} - 2 + e^{-2x}}{2} = 2 2 + e 2 x − 2 + e − 2 x
= e 2 x + e − 2 x 2 = \frac{e^{2x} + e^{-2x}}{2} = 2 e 2 x + e − 2 x
= cosh 2 x = LHS = \cosh 2x = \text{LHS} = cosh 2 x = LHS
(b) Solve the equation:
cosh 2 x − 3 sinh x = 15 \cosh 2x - 3\sinh x = 15 cosh 2 x − 3 sinh x = 15
giving your answers as exact logarithms.
Solution:
Using part (a):
1 + 2 sinh 2 x − 3 sinh x = 15 1 + 2\sinh^2 x - 3\sinh x = 15 1 + 2 sinh 2 x − 3 sinh x = 15
Rearrange:
2 sinh 2 x − 3 sinh x − 14 = 0 2\sinh^2 x - 3\sinh x - 14 = 0 2 sinh 2 x − 3 sinh x − 14 = 0
Factorise:
( sinh x + 2 ) ( 2 sinh x − 7 ) = 0 (\sinh x + 2)(2\sinh x - 7) = 0 ( sinh x + 2 ) ( 2 sinh x − 7 ) = 0
Therefore:
sinh x = − 2 or sinh x = 7 2 \sinh x = -2 \text{ or } \sinh x = \frac{7}{2} sinh x = − 2 or sinh x = 2 7
For sinh x = − 2 \sinh x = -2 sinh x = − 2 :
x = ln ( − 2 + ( − 2 ) 2 + 1 ) = ln ( − 2 + 5 ) x = \ln(-2 + \sqrt{(-2)^2 + 1}) = \ln(-2 + \sqrt{5}) x = ln ( − 2 + ( − 2 ) 2 + 1 ) = ln ( − 2 + 5 )
For sinh x = 7 2 \sinh x = \dfrac{7}{2} sinh x = 2 7 :
x = ln ( 7 2 + ( 7 2 ) 2 + 1 ) = ln ( 7 + 53 2 ) x = \ln\!\left(\frac{7}{2} + \sqrt{\left(\frac{7}{2}\right)^2 + 1}\right) = \ln\!\left(\frac{7 + \sqrt{53}}{2}\right) x = ln ( 2 7 + ( 2 7 ) 2 + 1 ) = ln ( 2 7 + 53 )
Solve the equation:
5 tanh x + 7 = 5 sech x 5\tanh x + 7 = 5\operatorname{sech} x 5 tanh x + 7 = 5 sech x
Give each answer in the form ln k \ln k ln k where k k k is a rational number.
Solution:
Method 1: Using exponential definitions
5 e x − e − x e x + e − x + 7 = 10 e x + e − x 5\frac{e^x - e^{-x}}{e^x + e^{-x}} + 7 = \frac{10}{e^x + e^{-x}} 5 e x + e − x e x − e − x + 7 = e x + e − x 10
5 ( e x − e − x ) + 7 ( e x + e − x ) = 10 5(e^x - e^{-x}) + 7(e^x + e^{-x}) = 10 5 ( e x − e − x ) + 7 ( e x + e − x ) = 10
5 e x − 5 e − x + 7 e x + 7 e − x = 10 5e^x - 5e^{-x} + 7e^x + 7e^{-x} = 10 5 e x − 5 e − x + 7 e x + 7 e − x = 10
12 e x + 2 e − x = 10 12e^x + 2e^{-x} = 10 12 e x + 2 e − x = 10
6 e 2 x − 5 e x + 1 = 0 6e^{2x} - 5e^x + 1 = 0 6 e 2 x − 5 e x + 1 = 0
Let y = e x y = e^x y = e x , then:
6 y 2 − 5 y + 1 = 0 ⇒ ( 3 y − 1 ) ( 2 y − 1 ) = 0 6y^2 - 5y + 1 = 0 \Rightarrow (3y-1)(2y-1) = 0 6 y 2 − 5 y + 1 = 0 ⇒ ( 3 y − 1 ) ( 2 y − 1 ) = 0
Therefore y = 1 3 y = \dfrac{1}{3} y = 3 1 or y = 1 2 y = \dfrac{1}{2} y = 2 1 .
Hence x = ln ( 1 3 ) x = \ln\!\left(\dfrac{1}{3}\right) x = ln ( 3 1 ) or x = ln ( 1 2 ) x = \ln\!\left(\dfrac{1}{2}\right) x = ln ( 2 1 ) .
Method 2: Using tanh 2 x + sech 2 x = 1 \tanh^2 x + \operatorname{sech}^2 x = 1 tanh 2 x + sech 2 x = 1
5 tanh x + 7 = 5 sech x 5\tanh x + 7 = 5\operatorname{sech} x 5 tanh x + 7 = 5 sech x
5 tanh x − 5 sech x = − 7 5\tanh x - 5\operatorname{sech} x = -7 5 tanh x − 5 sech x = − 7
25 tanh 2 x + 70 tanh x + 49 = 25 sech 2 x 25\tanh^2 x + 70\tanh x + 49 = 25\operatorname{sech}^2 x 25 tanh 2 x + 70 tanh x + 49 = 25 sech 2 x
25 tanh 2 x + 70 tanh x + 49 = 25 ( 1 − tanh 2 x ) 25\tanh^2 x + 70\tanh x + 49 = 25(1-\tanh^2 x) 25 tanh 2 x + 70 tanh x + 49 = 25 ( 1 − tanh 2 x )
50 tanh 2 x + 70 tanh x + 24 = 0 50\tanh^2 x + 70\tanh x + 24 = 0 50 tanh 2 x + 70 tanh x + 24 = 0
2 ( 5 tanh x + 3 ) ( 5 tanh x + 4 ) = 0 2(5\tanh x + 3)(5\tanh x + 4) = 0 2 ( 5 tanh x + 3 ) ( 5 tanh x + 4 ) = 0
tanh x = − 3 5 or − 4 5 \tanh x = -\frac{3}{5} \text{ or } -\frac{4}{5} tanh x = − 5 3 or − 5 4
Using tanh x = e x − e − x e x + e − x = − 4 5 \tanh x = \dfrac{e^x - e^{-x}}{e^x + e^{-x}} = -\dfrac{4}{5} tanh x = e x + e − x e x − e − x = − 5 4 :
e x − e − x e x + e − x = − 4 5 ⇒ e x = 1 2 ⇒ x = ln ( 1 2 ) \frac{e^x - e^{-x}}{e^x + e^{-x}} = -\frac{4}{5} \Rightarrow e^x = \frac{1}{2} \Rightarrow x = \ln\!\left(\frac{1}{2}\right) e x + e − x e x − e − x = − 5 4 ⇒ e x = 2 1 ⇒ x = ln ( 2 1 )
Similarly for tanh x = − 3 5 \tanh x = -\dfrac{3}{5} tanh x = − 5 3 :
e x − e − x e x + e − x = − 3 5 ⇒ e x = 1 3 ⇒ x = ln ( 1 3 ) \frac{e^x - e^{-x}}{e^x + e^{-x}} = -\frac{3}{5} \Rightarrow e^x = \frac{1}{3} \Rightarrow x = \ln\!\left(\frac{1}{3}\right) e x + e − x e x − e − x = − 5 3 ⇒ e x = 3 1 ⇒ x = ln ( 3 1 )
Method 3: Using sinh x \sinh x sinh x and cosh x \cosh x cosh x
5 sinh x + 7 cosh x = 5 5\sinh x + 7\cosh x = 5 5 sinh x + 7 cosh x = 5
5 sinh x + 7 cosh x − 5 = 0 5\sinh x + 7\cosh x - 5 = 0 5 sinh x + 7 cosh x − 5 = 0
24 sinh 2 x + 50 sinh x + 24 = 0 24\sinh^2 x + 50\sinh x + 24 = 0 24 sinh 2 x + 50 sinh x + 24 = 0
sinh x = − 4 3 or − 3 4 \sinh x = -\frac{4}{3} \text{ or } -\frac{3}{4} sinh x = − 3 4 or − 4 3
Using sinh x = e x − e − x 2 \sinh x = \dfrac{e^x - e^{-x}}{2} sinh x = 2 e x − e − x :
e x − e − x 2 = − 4 3 ⇒ e x = 1 3 or 1 2 \frac{e^x - e^{-x}}{2} = -\frac{4}{3} \Rightarrow e^x = \frac{1}{3} \text{ or } \frac{1}{2} 2 e x − e − x = − 3 4 ⇒ e x = 3 1 or 2 1
Leading to the same answers.
Consider a flexible chain hanging under its own weight. We’ll derive its shape — the famous catenary curve y = a cosh ( x a ) y = a\cosh\!\left(\dfrac{x}{a}\right) y = a cosh ( a x ) .
Let’s establish our coordinate system:
x x x -axis horizontal, y y y -axis vertical upward
ρ \rho ρ = mass per unit length of the chain
s s s = arc length from the bottom to point P ( x , y ) P(x,y) P ( x , y )
T T T = tension at point P P P
T h T_h T h = horizontal component of tension (constant throughout the chain)
For a small segment of the chain:
Mass of segment = ρ s \rho s ρ s (proportional to arc length)
Tension T T T acts tangent to the curve
T h T_h T h remains constant (key insight!)
θ \theta θ is the angle between T T T and horizontal
From the force balance:
T sin θ = ρ s g (vertical force balance) T\sin\theta = \rho s g \quad \text{(vertical force balance)} T sin θ = ρ s g (vertical force balance)
T cos θ = T h (horizontal force balance) T\cos\theta = T_h \quad \text{(horizontal force balance)} T cos θ = T h (horizontal force balance)
For a small segment:
sin θ = d y d s \sin\theta = \frac{dy}{ds} sin θ = d s d y
cos θ = d x d s \cos\theta = \frac{dx}{ds} cos θ = d s d x
Dividing the force equations:
tan θ = ρ s g T h = d y d x \tan\theta = \frac{\rho s g}{T_h} = \frac{dy}{dx} tan θ = T h ρ s g = d x d y
Let a = T h ρ g a = \dfrac{T_h}{\rho g} a = ρ g T h , then:
d y d x = s a \frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{s}{a} d x d y = a s
From the differential triangle:
d s 2 = d x 2 + d y 2 therefore d s d x = 1 + ( d y d x ) 2 ds^2 = dx^2 + dy^2 \quad \text{therefore} \quad \frac{ds}{dx} = \sqrt{1 + \left(\frac{dy}{dx}\right)^2} d s 2 = d x 2 + d y 2 therefore d x d s = 1 + ( d x d y ) 2
Differentiating d y d x = s a \dfrac{dy}{dx} = \dfrac{s}{a} d x d y = a s with respect to x x x :
d 2 y d x 2 = 1 a d s d x = 1 a 1 + ( d y d x ) 2 \frac{d^2y}{dx^2} = \frac{1}{a}\frac{ds}{dx} = \frac{1}{a}\sqrt{1 + \left(\frac{dy}{dx}\right)^2} d x 2 d 2 y = a 1 d x d s = a 1 1 + ( d x d y ) 2
We have derived the differential equation:
d 2 y d x 2 = 1 a 1 + ( d y d x ) 2 \frac{d^2y}{dx^2} = \frac{1}{a}\sqrt{1 + \left(\frac{dy}{dx}\right)^2} d x 2 d 2 y = a 1 1 + ( d x d y ) 2
Question: Try to solve this equation with the following hints:
Substitute d y d x \dfrac{dy}{dx} d x d y by p p p .
The derivative of arsinh ( p ) \operatorname{arsinh}(p) arsinh ( p ) is 1 1 + p 2 \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{1 + p^2}} 1 + p 2 1 . (We will study this in Chapter 3. You can also prove it by yourself using the definition of arsinh ( p ) \operatorname{arsinh}(p) arsinh ( p ) .)
The derivative of sinh ( x ) \sinh(x) sinh ( x ) is cosh ( x ) \cosh(x) cosh ( x ) . (We will also study this in Chapter 3. You can also prove it by yourself using the definition of sinh ( x ) \sinh(x) sinh ( x ) and cosh ( x ) \cosh(x) cosh ( x ) in terms of exponentials.)
Solution:
Using the hint about arsinh ( p ) \operatorname{arsinh}(p) arsinh ( p ) , we can integrate directly:
arsinh ( p ) = x a + C 1 \operatorname{arsinh}(p) = \frac{x}{a} + C_1 arsinh ( p ) = a x + C 1
Therefore:
p = sinh ( x a + C 1 ) p = \sinh\!\left(\frac{x}{a} + C_1\right) p = sinh ( a x + C 1 )
Since p = d y d x p = \dfrac{dy}{dx} p = d x d y , we can absorb C 1 C_1 C 1 into our choice of origin:
d y d x = sinh ( x a ) \frac{dy}{dx} = \sinh\!\left(\frac{x}{a}\right) d x d y = sinh ( a x )
Integrating again:
y = a cosh ( x a ) + C 2 y = a\cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{a}\right) + C_2 y = a cosh ( a x ) + C 2
This is the general equation of a catenary curve, where:
a a a determines the “scale” of the curve
C 2 C_2 C 2 shifts the curve vertically
Prove that the tension at any point is:
T = T h cosh ( x a ) T = T_h\cosh\!\left(\frac{x}{a}\right) T = T h cosh ( a x )
Research: Why do suspension bridges follow a parabolic shape instead of a catenary? (Hint: Consider how the load is distributed)
Historical Note: The Catenary Challenge
It is important to highlight the historical significance of the catenary, particularly the challenge posed by mathematician Jacob Bernoulli in the late 17th century. Bernoulli offered a prize for the solution to the problem of determining the shape of a hanging chain or cable, which is known as the catenary.
The catenary curve, described by the equation y = a cosh ( x a ) y = a\cosh\!\left(\dfrac{x}{a}\right) y = a cosh ( a x ) , was first studied by the ancient Greeks, but it was Bernoulli’s challenge that reignited interest in this fascinating shape. The problem attracted the attention of many prominent mathematicians, including Leonhard Euler and Johann Bernoulli, who sought to derive the mathematical properties of the catenary.
Bernoulli’s prize not only stimulated research into the catenary but also contributed to the development of calculus and the understanding of hyperbolic functions. The catenary’s unique properties, such as its ability to minimise potential energy, made it a crucial subject of study in both mathematics and engineering.